Meaning: The quote you have provided is from the philosopher Josiah Royce and it appears to be discussing the concept of idealism, particularly in relation to the philosopher George Berkeley. In this quote, Royce refers to a "preparatory sort of idealism" that Berkeley made prominent, suggesting that this idealism is familiar and frequently described. Let's explore the context and meaning of this quote in more detail.

Idealism is a philosophical perspective that emphasizes the role of the mind or consciousness in creating the world and the nature of reality. It posits that the physical world is in some way dependent on the mind, often leading to the view that reality is ultimately mental or spiritual in nature. George Berkeley, an influential philosopher of the 18th century, is known for his version of idealism, often referred to as "subjective idealism" or "immaterialism."

Berkeley's idealism is based on the principle that to be is to be perceived, encapsulated in his famous dictum "esse est percipi" (to be is to be perceived). In other words, according to Berkeley, the existence of objects is dependent on their being perceived by a mind. This leads to the conclusion that the physical world is ultimately composed of ideas or perceptions, rather than material substances existing independently of perception.

In the quote, Royce acknowledges Berkeley's prominent role in advancing this form of idealism and suggests that it is a view that has been frequently described and illustrated. Royce also expresses a desire to state this idealism in his own way, indicating a recognition of the enduring significance of Berkeley's ideas and the ongoing relevance of idealism as a philosophical perspective.

Royce's reference to a "preparatory sort of idealism" may suggest that he sees Berkeley's idealism as laying the groundwork or preparing the way for further developments or refinements within the broader tradition of idealist thought. It is worth noting that idealism has been a persistent and influential strand within the history of philosophy, with variations and adaptations emerging in different historical periods and intellectual contexts.

One interpretation of Royce's statement is that he is acknowledging the foundational significance of Berkeley's idealism while also signaling his intention to offer a fresh perspective or articulation of these ideas. This reflects a common aspect of philosophical discourse, where thinkers engage in a continual dialogue with the ideas of their predecessors, seeking to build upon, critique, or reinterpret earlier philosophical positions.

Royce's reference to seeking novelty in illustrating the view of idealism suggests a recognition of the challenge of presenting familiar ideas in a new and engaging manner. This speaks to the ongoing vitality and relevance of idealism as a philosophical perspective, as well as the creative and interpretive tasks faced by philosophers in communicating complex and enduring concepts to new audiences.

In conclusion, the quote from Josiah Royce highlights the enduring influence of George Berkeley's idealism and the ongoing relevance of idealism within the broader philosophical tradition. It also reflects the dynamic nature of philosophical discourse, as thinkers engage with and seek to reinterpret familiar ideas in pursuit of fresh insights and understandings. Royce's acknowledgment of Berkeley's prominence and his intent to present the idealist view in his own way invites further exploration of the rich and complex terrain of idealist thought.