Meaning: The quote by Stephen Bennett touches on the potential impact of an interview on a pro-"gay" piece. To fully understand the context, it is essential to delve into the background of Stephen Bennett and the broader societal and cultural implications of the term "pro-gay." Stephen Bennett is a prominent figure in the realm of LGBTQ+ activism and advocacy. He is known for his work as an ex-gay activist and his controversial views on homosexuality and LGBTQ+ rights.

The quote suggests that the interview, presumably with individuals or entities advocating for LGBTQ+ rights, would have a detrimental effect on their "pro-gay" narrative. This implies that the interview could potentially undermine the message or stance of those who are supportive of the LGBTQ+ community. Bennett's use of quotation marks around the term "gay" may also reflect his skepticism or opposition to the concept of being "pro-gay."

The term "pro-gay" itself is multifaceted and can be interpreted in various ways. It generally refers to individuals, organizations, or movements that actively support and advocate for the rights and equality of LGBTQ+ individuals. This can encompass a wide range of activities, including promoting LGBTQ+ rights, combating discrimination, and working towards societal acceptance and inclusion.

Bennett's assertion that the interview would do more damage to the "pro-gay" piece suggests a belief that the interview would expose vulnerabilities or inconsistencies in the pro-LGBTQ+ narrative. This could be related to the potential for the interview to challenge prevailing assumptions, highlight dissenting perspectives, or reveal underlying issues within the pro-LGBTQ+ movement.

It is essential to recognize that Bennett's views are controversial and have been met with criticism from LGBTQ+ activists and allies. His advocacy for ex-gay conversion therapy and his opposition to LGBTQ+ rights have been widely condemned by many within the LGBTQ+ community and its supporters. As such, his perspective on the potential impact of the interview on the "pro-gay" piece should be considered within the broader context of his beliefs and activism.

The quote raises important questions about the dynamics of public discourse surrounding LGBTQ+ issues. It prompts consideration of the complexities and tensions that exist within discussions about LGBTQ+ rights, representation, and advocacy. The notion that an interview could be perceived as damaging to a "pro-gay" narrative highlights the contested nature of LGBTQ+ visibility and representation in the media and public sphere.

Furthermore, the quote underscores the significance of dialogue and engagement in shaping public perceptions and attitudes towards LGBTQ+ individuals and communities. It speaks to the potential power of media representation and the ways in which interviews and discussions can influence public opinion and understanding of LGBTQ+ issues.

In conclusion, the quote by Stephen Bennett offers insight into the complexities of LGBTQ+ advocacy and representation. It invites critical reflection on the impact of media engagements and the contested nature of narratives surrounding LGBTQ+ rights. It also serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggles and debates within the LGBTQ+ movement and the importance of diverse voices in shaping public discourse on these issues.