Meaning: Mark Rylance, an esteemed actor known for his work in theater, film, and television, made this thought-provoking statement about the different levels of enjoyment and interpretation when it comes to plays and the authorship question. This quote sheds light on the multifaceted nature of audience engagement with theatrical works and the ongoing debate surrounding the true authors of certain literary works.

When Rylance mentions that people enjoy plays at completely different levels, he is likely referring to the diverse ways in which audiences engage with and appreciate theatrical performances. Plays have the power to resonate with individuals on various levels, depending on their personal experiences, cultural background, and emotional receptivity. Some may be drawn to the intricate nuances of the dialogue and character development, while others may find profound meaning in the overarching themes and messages conveyed by the play. Additionally, the visual and auditory aspects of a production, such as set design, costumes, and musical accompaniment, can also contribute to the diverse levels of enjoyment experienced by audience members.

Furthermore, Rylance's mention of the authorship question alludes to the enduring debate surrounding the true authors of certain literary works, most notably the plays attributed to William Shakespeare. The authorship question has sparked scholarly inquiry, conspiracy theories, and public fascination for centuries, as some researchers and enthusiasts have questioned whether Shakespeare was the sole author of the works attributed to him. This debate has given rise to various theories proposing alternative authors, such as Francis Bacon, Christopher Marlowe, or even a collective of writers, challenging the traditional attribution of Shakespearean plays.

Rylance's acknowledgment of the enjoyment of the authorship question at completely different levels reflects the diverse perspectives and interpretations that individuals bring to this contentious topic. For some, the authorship question may serve as an intellectual puzzle, prompting deep exploration of historical evidence and literary analysis. Others may find intrigue in the conspiratorial allure of alternative authorship theories, adding an element of mystery and speculation to the discussion. Additionally, the authorship question has also inspired creative works, such as novels, films, and plays that reimagine the possible identities of Shakespearean authors, further enriching the multifaceted enjoyment of this debate.

In the context of theater and literary scholarship, Rylance's quote underscores the complex and subjective nature of audience engagement with plays and the authorship question. It highlights the fact that individuals bring their own unique perspectives, interests, and motivations to their experience of theatrical performances and scholarly debates. This diversity of interpretation and enjoyment enriches the cultural significance of plays and the ongoing discourse surrounding authorship, fostering a vibrant and dynamic landscape of artistic appreciation and intellectual inquiry.

In conclusion, Mark Rylance's insightful quote encapsulates the rich tapestry of audience engagement with plays and the enduring fascination with the authorship question. It acknowledges the diverse levels of enjoyment and interpretation that individuals bring to theatrical experiences and scholarly debates, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of artistic appreciation and intellectual inquiry in the realm of theater and literature.