Meaning: The quote "To pass to the deluge, and beyond it, and to come to close quarters with our proper division, the origin of Romance itself is a very debatable subject, or rather it is a subject which the wiser mind will hardly care to debate much" by George Saintsbury addresses the contentious nature of determining the origin of Romance literature. George Saintsbury, a renowned literary critic and historian, was known for his insightful commentary on various literary genres and movements. In this quote, he suggests that the origin of Romance literature is a complex and debatable topic, and may not be worth debating extensively for those with a discerning understanding of literary history.

Romance literature, often associated with tales of chivalry, love, and adventure, has a rich and varied history that spans centuries. The origins of Romance literature can be traced back to ancient and medieval literary traditions, and its evolution has been shaped by diverse cultural, social, and historical influences. Saintsbury's quote captures the elusive nature of pinpointing a definitive origin for this genre, highlighting the challenges and complexities involved in such an endeavor.

The phrase "To pass to the deluge, and beyond it" alludes to the idea of navigating through a vast and tumultuous sea of historical and literary sources in order to uncover the origins of Romance literature. This imagery evokes the notion of wading through a flood of information and historical context in pursuit of understanding the genesis of this literary genre. It conveys the arduous and daunting task of delving into the depths of literary history to unravel the complexities of Romance literature's beginnings.

Saintsbury's mention of "close quarters with our proper division" suggests the importance of closely examining and understanding the distinct elements and subdivisions within the broader category of Romance literature. This implies that delving into the origins of Romance involves not only identifying its historical roots but also understanding its various subgenres, thematic elements, and stylistic characteristics. It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive and nuanced approach to studying the multifaceted nature of Romance literature.

The quote further asserts that the origin of Romance literature is a "very debatable subject," indicating the existence of differing scholarly perspectives and interpretations regarding its beginnings. This reflects the ongoing scholarly discourse and debate surrounding the historical and cultural origins of Romance literature. Saintsbury's acknowledgment of the contentious nature of this subject underscores the complexity and ambiguity inherent in tracing the lineage of a literary genre that has undergone extensive transformations over time.

Moreover, Saintsbury suggests that "the wiser mind will hardly care to debate much" about the origin of Romance literature. This statement implies that, in light of the intricacies and uncertainties surrounding this topic, engaging in prolonged debates about its origins may not necessarily yield conclusive or meaningful insights. Instead, he seems to advocate for a more discerning and pragmatic approach to studying the evolution of Romance literature, one that prioritizes a deeper understanding of its literary achievements, thematic richness, and cultural significance over fixating on its elusive origins.

In conclusion, George Saintsbury's quote encapsulates the intricate and contested nature of determining the origin of Romance literature. It underscores the challenges and complexities involved in unraveling the historical roots of this genre while emphasizing the need for a nuanced and discerning approach to studying its evolution. By acknowledging the debatable nature of this subject and advocating for a thoughtful perspective on the matter, Saintsbury's quote invites readers to contemplate the multifaceted and ever-evolving nature of Romance literature within the broader tapestry of literary history.