Meaning: The quote by George Saintsbury addresses the historical development of prose fiction in Western European literature and its comparative absence in the classical languages. Saintsbury, a renowned literary historian and critic, highlights the paradoxical nature of the late emergence of prose fiction in Western European literature despite its prominence in modern literary traditions. This quote invites an exploration of the historical and cultural factors that contributed to the evolution of prose fiction as a literary form.

In examining the development of prose fiction, it is essential to consider the cultural and linguistic context of ancient civilizations such as Greece and Rome. The classical languages of Greek and Latin were primarily associated with epic poetry, drama, and philosophical discourse, with a relatively limited tradition of prose fiction. The absence of a distinct category for prose fiction in these classical languages reflects the dominance of other literary forms and the cultural values that shaped literary production during that time.

The emergence of prose fiction in Western European literature occurred during the medieval and early modern periods, marked by the rise of vernacular languages and the proliferation of storytelling traditions. The development of the novel as a prominent literary genre was influenced by various cultural, social, and technological advancements, including the printing press, which facilitated the widespread dissemination of written works. The expansion of literacy and the growing appetite for imaginative storytelling further contributed to the flourishing of prose fiction in Western European literature.

Saintsbury's characterization of prose fiction as "one of the least intelligible facts of literary history" underscores the complex and multifaceted nature of its evolution. The late emergence of prose fiction in Western European literature raises questions about the cultural, ideological, and linguistic barriers that may have impeded its earlier development. Furthermore, the comparative absence of prose fiction in the classical languages prompts an examination of the distinct literary traditions and aesthetic preferences that shaped ancient storytelling practices.

The quote also invites consideration of the evolving definitions and interpretations of prose fiction across different historical and cultural contexts. As literary forms continue to evolve, the boundaries of prose fiction have expanded to encompass a diverse array of narrative styles, themes, and storytelling techniques. This ongoing evolution underscores the dynamic nature of literary expression and the enduring relevance of prose fiction as a mode of creative and intellectual engagement.

In conclusion, George Saintsbury's quote sheds light on the historical trajectory of prose fiction in Western European literature and its comparative absence in the classical languages. By prompting an exploration of the cultural, linguistic, and technological factors that influenced the development of prose fiction, the quote invites a deeper understanding of the complex and multifaceted nature of literary history. Through this lens, we gain valuable insights into the evolving definitions and interpretations of prose fiction, highlighting its enduring significance as a form of artistic expression and cultural reflection.