Meaning: The quote "I think American cinema, particularly, has become so disposable. It's not even cinema, It's just moviemaking" by Eriq La Salle, an American actor, director, and producer, reflects a sentiment shared by many within the film industry and among moviegoers. La Salle's critique touches on the evolving nature of American cinema and the impact of commercialization on the art form. In this analysis, we will delve into the context of the quote, exploring the transformation of American cinema, the influence of commercialization, and the implications for the art of filmmaking.

American cinema has a rich and storied history, from the Golden Age of Hollywood to the rise of independent filmmaking. However, in recent years, there has been a noticeable shift in the industry, characterized by an emphasis on commercial success and mass appeal. This trend has led to an increase in formulaic, high-budget productions that prioritize profit over artistic expression. As a result, many critics argue that the quality and integrity of American cinema have been compromised, giving rise to what La Salle refers to as "moviemaking" rather than true cinema.

The rise of franchise films, sequels, and reboots has contributed to the perception of American cinema as disposable. While these types of movies can be entertaining and financially successful, they often prioritize spectacle and marketability over originality and depth. As a result, some industry insiders and film enthusiasts have expressed concern that the artistry and innovation that once defined American cinema are being overshadowed by a relentless pursuit of box office returns.

Furthermore, the dominance of streaming platforms and digital distribution has transformed the way audiences engage with films. While these technological advancements have expanded access to a wide range of content, they have also contributed to a culture of instant gratification and fleeting attention spans. As a result, some argue that the disposable nature of American cinema has been perpetuated by the demand for constant, easily consumable entertainment.

Eriq La Salle's critique also raises questions about the distinction between "cinema" and "moviemaking." While the terms are often used interchangeably, they carry different connotations. "Cinema" traditionally evokes artistry, storytelling, and cultural significance, while "moviemaking" may be associated with the industrial, commercial aspects of film production. La Salle's distinction suggests that American cinema has veered towards the latter, prioritizing the mechanics of producing movies over the art of crafting meaningful cinematic experiences.

In response to these challenges, some filmmakers and industry professionals have sought to preserve the art of cinema by championing independent, auteur-driven projects that prioritize creative vision and storytelling. Independent cinema has long been celebrated for its willingness to take risks, explore unconventional narratives, and address thought-provoking themes. Additionally, the resurgence of interest in arthouse films and international cinema has provided audiences with alternatives to mainstream, disposable entertainment.

In conclusion, Eriq La Salle's critique of American cinema as disposable reflects broader concerns about the evolving nature of the film industry. The commercialization of filmmaking, the rise of franchise-dominated entertainment, and the influence of digital distribution have all contributed to a perception of cinema as disposable rather than enduring. However, amidst these challenges, there remains a steadfast commitment to preserving the art of cinema through independent, visionary storytelling. While the landscape of American cinema may continue to evolve, the enduring power of storytelling and artistic expression will always be at the heart of the cinematic experience.

If you need help with HTML formatting, please let me know!