Meaning: This quote by Jennifer Saunders, a well-known comedian, reflects on the evolution of media and the desensitization to violent or shocking content that has occurred over time. The quote suggests that there was a time when the release of a "scary video" involving the police would have been a rare and attention-grabbing event, prompting people to gather and watch in amazement. However, Saunders points out that now such content has become so common that it is ubiquitous across all channels.

The quote speaks to the broader phenomenon of desensitization to violence and sensationalism in media. When a shocking or disturbing event is repeatedly broadcasted, it can lose its impact as viewers become accustomed to its presence. This desensitization can have significant implications for society's perceptions of violence, law enforcement, and the media's role in shaping public discourse.

In the context of law enforcement, the quote may be interpreted as commentary on the proliferation of police-related videos in the media. With the widespread availability of recording devices and social media platforms, videos capturing police actions, whether heroic or contentious, have become a regular feature of news coverage. The quote suggests that the initial novelty and shock value of such videos have given way to a sense of routine and predictability.

Furthermore, the quote may also allude to the potential impact of constant exposure to such content on public attitudes towards law enforcement. If violent or controversial police videos are constantly circulating in the media, it could contribute to a normalization of such incidents and potentially shape public perceptions of law enforcement practices.

Saunders' observation also points to the broader trend of sensationalism in media. The quote implies that the media landscape has become saturated with content designed to provoke strong emotional reactions, whether through fear, outrage, or shock. This saturation can lead to a jaded audience that is no longer as easily impressed or affected by sensational content.

The quote's emphasis on the ubiquity of such content across all channels underscores the pervasive nature of sensationalism in modern media. The constant bombardment of shocking or frightening images and stories can contribute to a culture of desensitization, where audiences become increasingly indifferent to the gravity of the events being presented.

In conclusion, Jennifer Saunders' quote encapsulates the evolution of media consumption and the desensitization to shocking content, particularly in relation to police-related videos. It serves as a poignant commentary on the impact of constant exposure to sensational and violent media content and raises important questions about the implications for public perceptions and societal attitudes. The quote invites reflection on the role of the media in shaping our responses to such content and the potential consequences of desensitization in our society.