To this day, I get rewrite offers where they say: 'We feel this script needs work with character, dialogue, plot and tone,' and when you ask what's left, they say: 'Well, the typing is very good.'

Profession: Director

Topics: Work, Character, Day, Needs,

Wallpaper of quote
Views: 45
Meaning: John Sayles, an accomplished director, screenwriter, and author, offers a humorous yet insightful commentary on the nature of rewrite offers in the film industry. His quote, "To this day, I get rewrite offers where they say: 'We feel this script needs work with character, dialogue, plot and tone,' and when you ask what's left, they say: 'Well, the typing is very good,'" sheds light on the challenges and frustrations that many writers and filmmakers encounter when navigating the collaborative and often subjective process of script development and revision.

Sayles' quote underscores the common experience of receiving vague and seemingly contradictory feedback on a script. The mention of needing work on "character, dialogue, plot, and tone" reflects the broad and essential elements of storytelling that are often subject to critique and revision in the scriptwriting process. These aspects are fundamental to the overall quality and impact of a screenplay, as they shape the narrative, drive character development, and establish the emotional and thematic resonance of the story.

The comedic punchline of the quote, "Well, the typing is very good," humorously highlights the absurdity of reducing a script's value to the technical proficiency of its formatting and presentation. Sayles' use of irony serves to emphasize the frustration and lack of clarity that can accompany feedback from industry professionals tasked with providing constructive criticism and guidance for script improvement.

Sayles' quote resonates with many writers and filmmakers who have encountered similar challenges in receiving feedback on their work. It reflects the ongoing struggle of balancing artistic vision and creative integrity with the demands and expectations of industry gatekeepers. The quote also speaks to the broader issues of communication and interpretation within collaborative creative processes, where subjective opinions and preferences can significantly influence the trajectory of a project.

In the context of the film industry, where scripts often undergo multiple revisions and are subject to the input of various stakeholders, Sayles' quote serves as a reminder of the complexities and nuances involved in script development. It underscores the importance of clear, specific, and constructive feedback that addresses the core elements of storytelling and filmmaking, rather than reducing the creative process to superficial or arbitrary criteria.

Moreover, the quote sheds light on the resilience and determination required of writers and filmmakers to navigate the often challenging and mystifying terrain of script development. It reflects the perseverance and sense of humor needed to weather the uncertainties and frustrations inherent in the pursuit of bringing a creative vision to fruition in a collaborative and competitive industry.

Ultimately, John Sayles' quote encapsulates the paradoxical nature of script revision and the often perplexing dynamics of creative feedback in the film industry. It serves as a wry and insightful commentary on the intricate and sometimes exasperating process of refining and perfecting a screenplay, while also highlighting the enduring spirit and tenacity of storytellers who persist in pursuing their craft despite the obstacles they encounter.

In conclusion, John Sayles' quote offers a compelling and relatable perspective on the challenges and idiosyncrasies of script development in the film industry. It invites reflection on the complexities of creative feedback and the resilience required to navigate the collaborative and subjective nature of script revision. Sayles' astute observation resonates with aspiring and experienced writers and filmmakers alike, serving as a reminder of the enduring pursuit of artistic excellence amidst the uncertainties and humor of the creative process.

0.0 / 5

0 Reviews

5
(0)

4
(0)

3
(0)

2
(0)

1
(0)