Meaning: John Sayles is an American independent filmmaker who is known for his unique storytelling and his ability to create thought-provoking films that often explore social and political issues. The quote, "I've always felt like I was on the margins. Once upon a time that's what independent used to mean," reflects Sayles' personal experience as an independent filmmaker and his understanding of the evolving nature of independence in the film industry.

Sayles' statement captures the essence of what it means to be an independent artist in a world dominated by mainstream media and corporate interests. By expressing his feeling of being on the margins, he acknowledges the challenges and struggles that independent artists often face. This sentiment resonates with many independent filmmakers and artists who work outside the conventional studio system and strive to create meaningful and authentic work.

The phrase "Once upon a time that's what independent used to mean" suggests that the definition of independence has changed over time. In the past, being independent meant operating on the margins, outside the influence of major studios and commercial interests. Independent filmmakers like Sayles were able to pursue their vision and tell stories that may not have been deemed commercially viable by mainstream standards. However, as the film industry has evolved, the concept of independence has also evolved, with independent films gaining more recognition and opportunities within the mainstream.

Sayles' quote also reflects the broader cultural shift in the understanding of independence. In today's interconnected world, independence is often associated with self-sufficiency, autonomy, and the ability to operate outside traditional structures. This shift can be seen in various fields, including business, technology, and the arts, where individuals and creators are increasingly empowered to pursue their passions and ideas without necessarily conforming to established norms.

In the context of filmmaking, the evolving definition of independence has both positive and negative implications. On the one hand, independent filmmakers now have access to a wider range of distribution platforms, funding opportunities, and resources that were previously unavailable to them. This has allowed for a greater diversity of voices and stories to reach audiences around the world. On the other hand, the blurring of lines between independent and mainstream cinema has raised questions about the co-optation of independent art by commercial interests, as well as the potential dilution of the independent spirit that once defined the movement.

Despite these challenges, Sayles' quote serves as a reminder of the enduring importance of independence in the creative process. Independent filmmakers continue to push boundaries, challenge conventions, and offer alternative perspectives that enrich the cinematic landscape. Their ability to operate on the margins, to defy expectations, and to remain true to their artistic vision is a testament to the enduring significance of independence in storytelling and filmmaking.

In conclusion, John Sayles' quote encapsulates the complex and evolving nature of independence in the film industry and beyond. It reflects the personal experiences of an independent artist and speaks to the broader cultural shifts in the understanding of independence. While the definition of independence may have changed over time, the spirit of independence continues to inspire and empower creators to pursue their artistic visions, challenge the status quo, and make meaningful contributions to the world of cinema.