Meaning: The quote "Why in the world would you have it interpreted by nine lawyers?" by Antonin Scalia, a prominent United States Supreme Court Justice, reflects his perspective on the role of the judiciary in interpreting the law. Antonin Scalia was known for his originalist approach to constitutional interpretation, which emphasized adhering to the original meaning of the text as understood at the time it was written. This quote encapsulates Scalia's skepticism about the idea of a small group of individuals, specifically nine lawyers on the Supreme Court, having the authority to interpret and apply the law to the entire nation.

In understanding this quote, it is important to consider the context in which Scalia made this statement. As a conservative jurist, Scalia was known for his strict adherence to the text of the Constitution and statutes, and his resistance to the idea of judges creating or altering laws based on their own policy preferences. He often criticized what he saw as judicial overreach, where courts, particularly the Supreme Court, would make decisions that he believed should be left to the democratic process or the legislative branch.

Scalia's question "Why in the world would you have it interpreted by nine lawyers?" reflects his belief that the interpretation of the law should not be left to a small, unelected group of individuals, but rather should be guided by the democratic process. From his perspective, leaving such significant decisions to a small group of lawyers, no matter how learned and experienced they may be, contradicted the principles of democratic governance and the separation of powers.

Furthermore, Scalia's statement can be understood in the broader context of the ongoing debate about the role of the judiciary in a democratic society. The idea of judicial review, which empowers courts to review and potentially invalidate laws and actions of the executive and legislative branches, has been a subject of much controversy. Critics often argue that unelected judges should not have the final say on crucial policy matters, especially when their decisions may have far-reaching implications for the entire country.

Moreover, Scalia's quote raises important questions about the legitimacy and accountability of the judiciary. By highlighting the role of "nine lawyers" in interpreting the law, he draws attention to the fact that the Supreme Court, as the highest judicial body in the United States, has immense power to shape the legal landscape. This power, according to Scalia, should be wielded cautiously and with due regard for democratic principles.

In conclusion, Antonin Scalia's quote "Why in the world would you have it interpreted by nine lawyers?" encapsulates his skepticism about the concentration of interpretive power in the hands of a small group of judges. It reflects his broader concerns about the role of the judiciary in a democratic society and the potential implications of judicial decision-making for the rule of law and democratic governance. Whether one agrees or disagrees with Scalia's views, his quote invites us to critically examine the role of the judiciary and the principles that should guide its exercise of power.