Meaning: The quote "Even with the best of intentions, even when they're very smart and knowledgeable - as opposed to George W., who is neither - it doesn't seem to matter." by Robert Scheer, a prominent journalist, encapsulates a sentiment that is often expressed in political discourse. The quote is a commentary on the perceived ineffectiveness of good intentions, intelligence, and knowledge in the face of political power and decision-making. It also includes a direct criticism of George W. Bush, the 43rd President of the United States. This quote reflects the frustration felt by many individuals when they perceive that merit and good intentions are not enough to bring about positive change in the political sphere.

Robert Scheer, the author of the quote, is an American journalist who has covered political and social issues for several decades. He is known for his critical analysis of American politics and has written extensively on topics such as government policies, foreign affairs, and civil liberties. Scheer's work often reflects his deep concern for social justice and his commitment to holding those in power accountable for their actions.

The first part of the quote, "Even with the best of intentions, even when they're very smart and knowledgeable," highlights the common belief that individuals with good intentions and high intelligence should be able to make a positive impact in the political arena. This sentiment is often shared by those who believe that leaders should possess not only expertise but also a genuine desire to improve the lives of their constituents. However, the second part of the quote, "as opposed to George W., who is neither - it doesn't seem to matter," introduces a direct critique of a specific political figure, in this case, George W. Bush. This criticism suggests that despite lacking the qualities of good intentions, intelligence, and knowledge, George W. Bush was able to wield significant political power and influence.

The quote can be interpreted as a commentary on the disillusionment experienced by individuals who witness political decisions that seem to disregard expertise and moral integrity. It speaks to the frustration of those who believe that meritocracy and good governance should be the foundation of political leadership. The mention of George W. Bush specifically serves to illustrate the perceived dissonance between the qualities expected of a leader and the reality of political power dynamics.

In the context of American politics, George W. Bush's presidency was marked by controversial decisions, including the invasion of Iraq and the response to Hurricane Katrina. These events sparked widespread debate and criticism, contributing to the polarized perception of his administration. Scheer's quote reflects a broader sentiment prevalent during that time, as many individuals questioned the alignment of political leadership with the values of intelligence, knowledge, and good intentions.

Overall, the quote by Robert Scheer captures the frustration and disillusionment felt by many individuals when they perceive that merit and good intentions are not enough to drive positive change in the political sphere. It also serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges inherent in the intersection of politics, power, and ethical leadership. Through his quote, Scheer invites reflection on the qualities that should underpin effective governance and the impact of political decisions on society.