Meaning: The quote by Phyllis Schlafly addresses the controversial topic of women in combat, asserting that countries that have allowed women to participate in actual combat have ultimately rejected the idea, and that the notion of Israel using women in combat is a feminist myth. This quote reflects the ongoing debate surrounding the roles of women in the military and the broader implications of gender equality within armed forces.

Phyllis Schlafly was a prominent conservative activist known for her opposition to the women's liberation movement and her advocacy for traditional gender roles. Her views on women in the military reflect her broader stance on gender issues, and her assertion that the use of women in combat is a feminist myth highlights her skepticism towards feminist perspectives on gender equality.

The debate over women in combat is deeply rooted in historical, social, and political contexts. Throughout history, women have played various roles in the military, often in supportive and non-combat positions. However, the question of whether women should be allowed to serve in combat roles has been a subject of intense scrutiny and controversy.

In the United States, the issue of women in combat gained significant attention with the repeal of the combat exclusion policy in 2013, which opened up combat roles to women. This decision was met with both support and opposition, reflecting the complex and diverse perspectives on the topic.

The argument that countries that have experimented with women in combat have ultimately abandoned the idea is a contentious claim. While some countries have indeed restricted or prohibited women from serving in combat roles, others have actively integrated women into their armed forces, including in combat positions. For example, countries like Norway, Canada, and Israel have allowed women to serve in combat roles, challenging the notion that all countries have abandoned the idea of women in combat.

The reference to Israel's use of women in combat as a "feminist myth" raises questions about the intersection of feminism and military policies. Feminist perspectives on women in the military vary, with some feminists advocating for equal opportunities for women to serve in combat roles, while others critique the inherently patriarchal and militaristic nature of armed forces. The portrayal of Israel's use of women in combat as a feminist myth suggests a skepticism towards feminist narratives that advocate for women's participation in traditionally male-dominated spheres such as the military.

It is important to consider the diverse experiences and perspectives of women in the military when discussing this topic. Women have served and continue to serve in various military capacities around the world, demonstrating their dedication, skill, and resilience in challenging environments. The debate over women in combat extends beyond the question of physical capabilities to encompass broader issues of gender equality, representation, and the evolving nature of modern warfare.

In conclusion, Phyllis Schlafly's quote reflects the ongoing debate and differing viewpoints regarding women in combat. The assertion that countries have abandoned the idea of women in combat and the characterization of Israel's use of women in combat as a feminist myth invite critical examination and further exploration of the complex intersection of gender, military policies, and societal attitudes towards women's roles in armed forces. The topic of women in combat continues to be a subject of ongoing discussion and evolution within the military and broader society.