Meaning: This quote by James Schuyler, a renowned American poet, offers insight into his writing process and approach to revising his work. Schuyler's statement reflects his preference for minimal revision, instead focusing on the act of cutting, especially at the end or towards the end of a poem. This approach sheds light on Schuyler's belief in the importance of precision and conciseness in poetry.

James Schuyler was a prominent figure in the New York School of poets, a group known for their avant-garde, experimental approach to poetry. Born in 1923, Schuyler's work often explored themes of everyday life, nature, and the complexities of human emotions. His unique style and keen attention to detail have earned him a lasting legacy in the world of poetry.

In the context of his quote, Schuyler's reluctance to revise extensively aligns with the New York School's emphasis on spontaneity and the immediate capture of thoughts and emotions. By favoring cutting over revising, Schuyler may have sought to preserve the raw, organic quality of his initial inspiration, believing that excessive revision could dilute the authenticity of his work.

Schuyler's inclination towards cutting, particularly at the end of a poem, speaks to his understanding of the significance of a poem's conclusion. The concluding lines of a poem often carry substantial weight, serving as the final impression left on the reader. Schuyler's practice of scrutinizing and trimming the concluding portion of his poems suggests a meticulous consideration of how he wanted his work to resonate and linger in the minds of his audience.

It is important to note that Schuyler's approach to revision is not a universal standard for all poets. Every poet has their own method and philosophy when it comes to the writing and revising process. Some poets may engage in extensive revision, believing that it is crucial to refining their work and achieving the desired impact. Others, like Schuyler, may find that their creative process is best served by preserving the initial spontaneity and essence of their work.

Schuyler's quote also invites contemplation on the role of revision in the creative process. While some poets may view revision as an opportunity to refine and perfect their work, others may see it as a potential threat to the authenticity and originality of their artistic expression. Schuyler's perspective serves as a reminder that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to writing and revising poetry, and that each poet must find their own balance between preservation and refinement.

In conclusion, James Schuyler's quote sheds light on his approach to poetry and the revision process. His preference for minimal revision and emphasis on cutting, especially towards the end of a poem, provides valuable insight into his belief in the importance of precision and the preservation of spontaneity in his work. While Schuyler's approach may not be universally applicable, it serves as a compelling reminder of the diverse perspectives and practices that enrich the world of poetry.