Meaning: This quote by William Scranton, a prominent American politician, highlights the issue of individuals sharing their opinions without being well-informed. Scranton's observation is particularly relevant in the context of political discourse and decision-making, where individuals often rely on sources within government agencies or Congress to form their opinions. The quote suggests that some people may be quick to offer their opinions without having a comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand.

In the quote, Scranton mentions that people are reaching out to their sources in Washington, specifically referencing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Congress. This indicates that the individuals seeking information are likely involved in or interested in matters related to nuclear regulation or broader legislative affairs. By reaching out to these sources, they are likely trying to gather information to form their opinions and potentially influence decision-making processes.

Scranton's remark about the lack of well-informed opinions in the early days of seeking information from Washington sources is significant. It underscores the importance of having access to accurate and comprehensive information before forming and expressing opinions, especially in matters of national significance. In the context of nuclear regulation, for example, uninformed opinions could have serious implications for public safety and the environment.

The quote also implies that the individuals seeking information may have been overconfident in their understanding of the issues, despite lacking well-informed opinions. This overconfidence could stem from their access to sources within government agencies and Congress, leading them to believe that their opinions are valid even when they are not well-grounded in facts and expertise.

Scranton's characterization of these early opinions as "not very well informed" suggests that he values the importance of being well-informed when expressing viewpoints, particularly in matters that have far-reaching consequences. This sentiment aligns with the principles of responsible and informed citizenship, as well as the ethical obligations of individuals in positions of influence.

In a broader sense, Scranton's quote serves as a reminder of the need for critical thinking and discernment when engaging in discussions about complex and consequential issues. It highlights the potential dangers of forming opinions based on incomplete or biased information, especially when that information is sourced from influential entities such as government agencies and legislative bodies.

Furthermore, the quote raises questions about the role of transparency and accountability within government institutions. If individuals are able to access information from Washington sources but are still not well-informed, it suggests a need for greater transparency and clarity in the communication of important matters to the public and stakeholders.

Overall, Scranton's quote encapsulates the challenges and pitfalls of forming opinions without a solid foundation of knowledge and expertise. It serves as a cautionary reminder of the importance of seeking well-informed perspectives, especially when dealing with issues that have significant impacts on society and the environment. In an age of rapid information dissemination and complex policy decisions, the quote encourages individuals to approach their own opinions with humility, open-mindedness, and a commitment to seeking out well-rounded and accurate information.