A cold atheistical materialism is the tendency of the so-called material philosophy of the present day.

Profession: Scientist

Topics: Day, Materialism, Philosophy, Present,

Wallpaper of quote
Views: 8
Meaning: The quote "A cold atheistical materialism is the tendency of the so-called material philosophy of the present day" by Adam Sedgwick, a prominent scientist, encapsulates the criticism of the prevailing material philosophy during his time. Adam Sedgwick was a British geologist who lived during the 19th century and was known for his contributions to the development of the geological sciences. In this quote, Sedgwick expresses his disapproval of the materialist philosophy that was gaining prominence during the 19th century.

Materialism, in philosophy, is the belief that only physical matter and its movements and modifications are real, and that everything can be explained in terms of matter and physical phenomena. Atheistic materialism, as referenced in the quote, adds the dimension of rejecting the existence of any supernatural or spiritual entities. This philosophical perspective was gaining traction during Sedgwick's time, particularly in the wake of scientific advancements and the growing influence of thinkers such as Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, who espoused dialectical materialism.

Sedgwick's use of the term "cold" to characterize atheistical materialism suggests his view of it as lacking in warmth, empathy, or spiritual depth. It conveys the idea that this philosophy, in his opinion, neglects or devalues the emotional and spiritual aspects of human existence. Sedgwick's criticism implies that atheistical materialism may lead to a dehumanizing worldview that reduces everything to cold, impersonal matter devoid of deeper meaning or purpose.

Sedgwick's reference to the "so-called material philosophy of the present day" indicates his skepticism towards the prevailing philosophical trends of his era. It suggests that he viewed the material philosophy of his time as lacking authenticity or as being mislabeled. He may have believed that the materialist perspective was being overstated or misrepresented, and that it was not a true reflection of the complexities of human existence and the natural world.

In the context of the 19th century, the rise of materialism can be linked to the progress of scientific thought and the growing influence of secularism. The advancements in scientific understanding, particularly in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, led to a shift towards explaining natural phenomena through empirical observation and material causes. This empirical approach challenged traditional religious and spiritual explanations, contributing to the rise of atheistic materialism.

The Industrial Revolution also played a significant role in shaping the materialist tendencies of the 19th century. The rapid technological advancements and the emphasis on material wealth and progress may have reinforced the perception of a world governed solely by physical laws and material forces. This societal focus on material gain and industrialization likely contributed to the emergence of a philosophical framework that prioritized the material aspects of existence.

Sedgwick's critique of atheistical materialism reflects broader debates about the relationship between science, philosophy, and spirituality during the 19th century. As a scientist, he may have been concerned about the potential consequences of reducing human experience and natural phenomena to purely materialistic explanations. His perspective highlights the tension between scientific progress and the preservation of spiritual and ethical values, a tension that continues to be relevant in contemporary discussions about the impact of scientific advancements on human society.

In conclusion, Adam Sedgwick's quote sheds light on the philosophical and cultural landscape of the 19th century, particularly the rise of atheistical materialism and its implications. His criticism of the cold and atheistic nature of material philosophy reflects a concern for the dehumanizing effects of reducing existence to purely materialistic explanations. Sedgwick's perspective serves as a reminder of the ongoing dialogue between science, philosophy, and spirituality, and the enduring quest to reconcile the material and immaterial aspects of human experience.

0.0 / 5

0 Reviews

5
(0)

4
(0)

3
(0)

2
(0)

1
(0)