Meaning: The quote "In quoting of books, quote such authors as are usually read; others you may read for your own satisfaction, but not name them" by John Selden, a renowned English jurist and scholar, reflects a pragmatic approach to referencing and citation in academic and scholarly works. Selden was known for his expertise in law, history, and antiquities, and his views on citation and referencing have continued to be influential in the academic and literary communities.

Selden's quote emphasizes the importance of citing well-known and widely recognized authors when quoting from books or other sources. This advice is rooted in the idea that citing established and respected authors lends credibility and authority to one's own work. By referencing commonly read authors, writers can demonstrate a familiarity with established scholarship and contribute to the ongoing scholarly conversation within a particular field.

Furthermore, Selden's quote suggests that while it may be personally satisfying to engage with lesser-known or niche authors, there may be limited value in explicitly naming them in one's own work. This perspective aligns with the practical considerations of academic writing, as citing obscure or less influential authors may not contribute significantly to the overall argument or credibility of a scholarly work.

Selden's advice also touches upon the concept of audience and readership. By quoting well-known authors, writers can ensure that their references are meaningful and recognizable to their intended audience, thereby facilitating a more effective and impactful communication of ideas. This approach acknowledges the importance of engaging with the existing body of scholarly literature and participating in a broader intellectual exchange.

From a practical standpoint, Selden's guidance encourages writers to prioritize the use of references that are likely to be familiar to their readers, thereby facilitating comprehension and enhancing the overall accessibility of their work. This aligns with the broader goal of effective communication in academic and scholarly writing, where clarity and relevance are paramount.

It is important to note that while Selden's advice reflects a practical and strategic approach to referencing, it does not diminish the value of exploring diverse and lesser-known sources for personal enrichment and intellectual curiosity. The distinction drawn by Selden suggests that while such sources may be personally satisfying and informative, they may not necessarily need to be prominently featured in formal academic or scholarly citations.

In summary, John Selden's quote provides valuable insights into the strategic considerations of referencing and citation in academic and scholarly writing. By emphasizing the importance of quoting well-known authors and considering the expectations and familiarity of the intended audience, Selden's advice continues to inform and guide writers in effectively engaging with existing scholarship and contributing to the ongoing intellectual discourse within their respective fields.

Overall, Selden's perspective serves as a reminder of the pragmatic and strategic dimensions of academic writing, where considerations of credibility, audience, and impact play crucial roles in the effective communication of ideas and the advancement of knowledge.