Meaning: The quote you've provided is a thought-provoking commentary on the intersection of art, censorship, and social attitudes towards sexuality. The speaker, Richard Serra, is a renowned sculptor known for his large-scale metal works and his exploration of the relationship between art, space, and the viewer. In this quote, Serra appears to be critiquing the role of administrators and authority figures in determining societal norms and values, particularly in relation to sexuality and the arts.

Serra's reference to "administrators deciding what sexuality is, and what's a taboo and what's not in terms of content" suggests a concern about the imposition of rigid standards and restrictions on artistic expression. This sentiment reflects a broader debate about censorship and the regulation of content in the arts, which has been a recurring issue throughout history. Artists often find themselves grappling with the boundaries of acceptability and the impact of societal norms on their creative freedom.

The mention of Trent Lott, a prominent political figure known for his conservative views, further underscores the theme of societal attitudes towards sexuality. Lott's equating of homosexuality with a disease exemplifies the stigmatization and discrimination that LGBTQ+ individuals have historically faced. Serra's use of Lott as an example may serve to highlight the influence of political figures and policymakers in shaping public perceptions of sexuality and shaping policies that impact the arts and freedom of expression.

Serra's quote prompts us to consider the power dynamics at play when it comes to determining what is deemed acceptable or taboo in both artistic content and discussions of sexuality. It raises important questions about who holds the authority to define and regulate these aspects of human experience, and the potential consequences of such control.

From an artistic perspective, Serra's words speak to the ongoing struggle for artists to challenge societal norms and push boundaries without facing censorship or backlash. The quote underscores the importance of maintaining the autonomy of creative expression and resisting efforts to limit or suppress certain themes or forms of artistic representation.

In a broader social context, the quote also touches on the need for greater understanding, acceptance, and inclusivity regarding diverse sexual orientations and identities. By referencing the attitude of a public figure towards homosexuality, Serra draws attention to the harmful impact of stigmatizing rhetoric and discriminatory beliefs, highlighting the ongoing need for progress and advocacy in the realm of LGBTQ+ rights.

In conclusion, Richard Serra's quote offers a thought-provoking commentary on the intersection of art, censorship, and societal attitudes towards sexuality. It serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges artists face in navigating issues of acceptability and freedom of expression, while also shedding light on the broader social and political dynamics that shape our perceptions of sexuality and influence policies that impact the arts. Serra's words encourage us to critically examine the power structures at play in these domains and to advocate for greater openness, understanding, and creative freedom.