Meaning: This quote by Eric Sevareid, a renowned journalist, encapsulates a fundamental distinction in the world of politics: the contrast between those who are driven by personal ambition and those who are motivated by a genuine desire to effect meaningful change. Sevareid's words highlight the crucial disparity between individuals who pursue political careers for the sake of power and recognition, and those who enter the political arena with a sincere commitment to enacting positive and impactful transformations.

In the realm of politics, the concept of "the men and the boys" extends beyond mere gender distinctions; it serves as a metaphor for the disparity between individuals who approach political leadership with a sense of duty and responsibility, and those who are primarily focused on self-aggrandizement and personal gain. The "boys" represent aspirants who are primarily concerned with attaining positions of authority and influence for their own sake, often driven by a desire for recognition and status. On the other hand, the "men" symbolize leaders who prioritize the substantive and constructive aspects of governance, seeking to make tangible and enduring contributions to the betterment of society.

Sevareid's assertion that "the boys want to be something, while the men want to do something" underscores the fundamental contrast between aspiration and action in the political sphere. The "boys" are characterized by their ambition to attain political office as a means of personal fulfillment and status elevation. Their primary focus is on the trappings of power and authority, with less emphasis on the practical implications of their leadership. In contrast, the "men" are motivated by a genuine desire to effect change and make a positive impact on their communities and the broader society. Their aspirations are centered on the substantive work of governance and the tangible outcomes of their actions.

This quote also speaks to the timeless nature of this distinction in politics. Throughout history, political landscapes have been shaped by the interplay between individuals driven by personal ambition and those motivated by a genuine commitment to public service. The tension between these two orientations has been a recurring theme in political discourse, as it reflects the broader struggle between self-interest and the common good.

Furthermore, Sevareid's words prompt reflection on the qualities and characteristics that define effective and principled political leadership. They highlight the importance of integrity, vision, and a genuine dedication to the welfare of the people. In essence, the quote underscores the notion that true leadership is rooted in a selfless commitment to the betterment of society, rather than the pursuit of personal accolades and status.

In conclusion, Eric Sevareid's quote serves as a poignant commentary on the essential dichotomy between those driven by personal ambition and those motivated by a genuine desire to effect meaningful change in the realm of politics. It reminds us of the enduring relevance of this distinction and the critical importance of ethical, purpose-driven leadership in shaping the future of our societies.