Meaning: This quote by George Bernard Shaw, the renowned Irish playwright, critic, and polemicist, is a thought-provoking commentary on the concept of common sense, good taste, originality, and moral courage. Shaw was known for his sharp wit and incisive observations on society, and this quote is no exception. In just a few words, Shaw challenges the conventional notions of common sense and good taste, suggesting that they may be at odds with originality and moral courage.

When Shaw refers to a "man of great common sense and good taste," he is likely alluding to someone who conforms to societal norms and expectations. Common sense is generally understood as practical, sound judgment based on experience and reasoning, while good taste often refers to a sense of refinement and propriety in one's choices and actions. These qualities are typically valued in society, as they contribute to stability, order, and harmony.

However, Shaw's use of the phrase "meaning thereby a man without originality or moral courage" introduces a critical perspective on the traditional virtues of common sense and good taste. By implying that these qualities may stifle originality and moral courage, Shaw challenges the notion that conformity and adherence to established norms are inherently virtuous. Instead, he suggests that the pursuit of common sense and good taste may come at the expense of individuality and ethical fortitude.

Shaw's assertion that a person with great common sense and good taste may lack originality underscores the tension between conformity and innovation. Originality involves the ability to think and act in new and unconventional ways, often challenging existing paradigms and norms. In contrast, common sense tends to prioritize adherence to established conventions and practical considerations, potentially inhibiting the pursuit of novel ideas and approaches. Shaw's commentary prompts us to question whether the pursuit of common sense and good taste may inadvertently hinder the emergence of fresh perspectives and creative breakthroughs.

Furthermore, Shaw's linkage of good taste with a lack of moral courage raises important questions about the relationship between social acceptance and ethical integrity. Good taste, as traditionally understood, implies an awareness of social mores and an inclination to conform to accepted standards of behavior and expression. However, Shaw's characterization of a person with good taste as lacking moral courage suggests that the pursuit of social approval and decorum may compromise one's willingness to confront ethical dilemmas and advocate for principled action.

In essence, Shaw's quote challenges us to reconsider the virtues of common sense and good taste, urging us to examine the potential trade-offs involved in prioritizing conformity and social approval over originality and moral courage. While common sense and good taste have their merits in promoting stability and harmony, Shaw's critique invites us to recognize the importance of nurturing individuality and ethical fortitude, even if it means transcending the confines of conventional wisdom and societal expectations.

In conclusion, George Bernard Shaw's quote serves as a thought-provoking reflection on the complex interplay between common sense, good taste, originality, and moral courage. By juxtaposing these concepts, Shaw encourages us to critically examine the potential tensions and trade-offs inherent in prioritizing conformity and social acceptance. Ultimately, Shaw's words prompt us to consider the value of embracing originality and moral courage, even in the face of societal pressures to adhere to common sense and good taste.