Meaning: In his quote, Michael Shermer, a prominent writer and science advocate, touches on the intersection of science and myth in modern society. The quote reflects the tension between the rational, evidence-based approach of science and the enduring human impulse to embrace and perpetuate myths and belief systems. It suggests that in the contemporary era, there is a tendency to seek validation for our myths through the lens of scientific evidence.

The phrase "we live in an age of science" acknowledges the dominant role that scientific knowledge and technology play in shaping our understanding of the world. The advancements in various scientific fields have revolutionized human civilization, leading to unprecedented progress in medicine, technology, and overall quality of life. As a result, the influence of scientific thinking permeates many aspects of modern society, from education and public policy to popular culture and entertainment.

Shermer's assertion about the preoccupation with corroborating myths reflects the enduring power of myth and belief systems in human culture. Myths have long served as a means to make sense of the world, providing narratives that explain natural phenomena, human origins, and the moral order of the universe. Despite the advancements of science, myths continue to hold sway over human imagination and belief, shaping religious, cultural, and societal frameworks.

The desire to corroborate myths through a scientific lens speaks to the ongoing quest for validation and legitimacy. In an age where empirical evidence holds significant authority, there is a natural inclination to seek scientific confirmation for beliefs and narratives deeply ingrained in human consciousness. This phenomenon is evident in various realms, including the search for archaeological and historical evidence to substantiate religious and cultural myths, as well as the pursuit of scientific explanations for paranormal experiences and supernatural phenomena.

The quote also highlights the complex relationship between science and belief, raising questions about the nature of truth and the boundaries of knowledge. While science offers a rigorous framework for understanding the natural world, it does not address the entirety of human experience. Myth and belief systems often encompass aspects of human existence that transcend empirical observation, such as morality, spirituality, and existential questions. As a result, the endeavor to reconcile myth and science reflects the ongoing dialogue between rational inquiry and the enduring mysteries of human consciousness and culture.

In contemporary discourse, this tension between science and myth is evident in debates surrounding topics such as evolution, climate change, and the origins of the universe. The clash between scientific consensus and deeply held beliefs underscores the complexities of navigating the intersection of empirical evidence and cultural narratives. This dynamic also underscores the need for nuanced and respectful dialogue that acknowledges the significance of both scientific inquiry and the enduring power of myth and belief in human society.

In conclusion, Michael Shermer's quote encapsulates the intricate interplay between science and myth in the modern age. It prompts reflection on the ways in which scientific knowledge and belief systems intersect, and the ongoing quest for validation and understanding. By acknowledging the enduring influence of myth alongside the advancements of science, the quote invites contemplation of the multifaceted nature of human knowledge and the complexities of navigating the relationship between empirical evidence and cultural narratives.