Meaning:
This quote by journalist David Shuster is a critique of the Fox News Channel and its programming. Shuster expresses his strong disapproval of the content and commentary provided by some of the prominent hosts on the network. The quote touches on several points, including the perceived quality of coverage, the nature of the comments made by specific hosts, and the overall impact of the network's programming.
Firstly, Shuster criticizes the coverage on the Fox News Channel, using the word "atrocious" to describe it. This suggests that he finds the quality of the reporting and analysis to be extremely poor or even morally reprehensible. Shuster's choice of words conveys a sense of deep disappointment and frustration with the network's approach to news and information dissemination.
Shuster then singles out specific hosts, Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly, and describes the content of their commentary as "infuriating" and "illogical" respectively. This indicates that Shuster perceives their statements and opinions as not only emotionally provocative but also lacking in rationality and sound reasoning. By highlighting these specific individuals, Shuster draws attention to what he sees as problematic elements within the network's lineup of personalities.
Furthermore, Shuster characterizes the overall programming on Fox News as "insanity" and criticizes the network for perpetuating and promoting a "number of lies." This suggests that he believes the network's content is not only irrational and infuriating but also built on a foundation of misinformation and dishonesty. Shuster's use of the word "shameful" underscores the severity of his criticism, implying that the practices of Fox News are morally objectionable and damaging to society as a whole.
In the final part of the quote, Shuster asserts that the impact of Fox News' conduct extends beyond the network itself, stating that it "hurts everybody." This broader perspective implies that Shuster sees the spread of falsehoods and irrationality as detrimental to society at large, suggesting a concern for the potential consequences of the network's programming on public discourse and civic engagement.
It is worth noting that David Shuster's perspective is just one among many, and there are varying opinions on the nature and impact of Fox News and its programming. Some may agree with his assessment, while others may hold different views on the network's content and its influence.
In conclusion, David Shuster's quote provides a critical perspective on the Fox News Channel, highlighting concerns about the quality of coverage, the nature of commentary by specific hosts, and the broader impact of the network's programming. Shuster's strong language and pointed criticism convey a sense of deep frustration and moral objection to what he perceives as the network's failings. This quote serves as a reminder of the ongoing debates and discussions surrounding media integrity, journalistic responsibility, and the role of news organizations in shaping public discourse.