Meaning: The quote by Dan Simmons, "Writing, I'm convinced, should be a subversive activity - frowned on by the authorities - and not one cooed over and praised beyond common sense by some teacher," encapsulates a thought-provoking perspective on the nature of writing and its role in society. At its core, this quote challenges the conventional notion of writing as a benign, passive activity and instead posits it as a potentially disruptive force that challenges authority and norms.

Simmons' assertion that writing should be subversive implies that it has the power to question established beliefs, challenge societal structures, and provoke critical thinking. In this context, "frowned on by the authorities" suggests that writing should not conform to the expectations or regulations set by those in power. Instead, it should act as a dissenting voice that challenges the status quo and encourages independent thought.

The second part of the quote, "and not one cooed over and praised beyond common sense by some teacher," further emphasizes the subversive nature of writing. Here, Simmons critiques the tendency for writing to be excessively lauded and celebrated within academic or institutional settings. By using the term "cooed over," he suggests that writing should not be treated with undue sentimentality or uncritical adulation. This viewpoint aligns with the idea that writing should not cater to the expectations or approval of authority figures, but rather maintain its autonomy and capacity for challenging established norms.

Simmons' perspective on writing as a subversive activity aligns with the broader tradition of literature and art as a means of resistance and subversion. Throughout history, many writers and artists have used their creative works to challenge prevailing ideologies, critique oppressive systems, and advocate for social change. From George Orwell's "1984" to Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale," literature has often served as a vehicle for dissent and resistance against authority.

Moreover, the notion of writing as subversive extends beyond the realm of fiction and literature. In journalism, for example, investigative reporting often involves uncovering uncomfortable truths and holding those in power accountable. Similarly, academic writing can challenge established theories and paradigms, pushing the boundaries of knowledge and understanding.

Simmons' quote also raises important questions about the role of education in shaping the perception of writing. By cautioning against excessive praise and sentimentality from teachers, he highlights the need for a critical and independent approach to writing. This challenges the traditional model of education that often seeks to standardize and institutionalize writing, potentially stifling its subversive potential.

In conclusion, Dan Simmons' quote offers a thought-provoking perspective on the subversive nature of writing and its potential to challenge authority and norms. By advocating for a critical, independent approach to writing, he encourages a reevaluation of the conventional perceptions of this art form. Ultimately, his words invite us to consider the transformative power of writing as a force for dissent, critical inquiry, and societal change.