Meaning: This quote by Goldwin Smith, a renowned historian, reflects his admiration and appreciation for the literary works of Charles Dickens and William Makepeace Thackeray. In this quote, Smith recounts a moment where he heard Thackeray express gratitude for the purity of Dickens' writing, to which Smith responds by expressing his own gratitude for the purity of a greater literary genius than Dickens, namely, Thackeray himself. This quote not only highlights the mutual respect between these two literary giants but also invites a deeper exploration of the themes of purity and greatness in their works.

Charles Dickens and William Makepeace Thackeray are both celebrated English novelists of the 19th century, known for their significant contributions to literature. Dickens is renowned for his vivid characters, intricate plots, and social commentary, while Thackeray is admired for his satirical wit, keen observations of society, and moral complexity in his narratives. Both authors have left a lasting impact on the literary world, and their works continue to be studied and appreciated by readers and scholars alike.

When Goldwin Smith refers to the "purity" of Dickens, he may be alluding to the moral and ethical clarity present in Dickens' writing. Dickens often depicted the struggles of the poor and the injustices of society, while championing themes of compassion, redemption, and the triumph of good over evil. His works, such as "Oliver Twist," "Great Expectations," and "A Tale of Two Cities," are known for their heartfelt portrayals of human resilience and the pursuit of justice.

On the other hand, when Smith expresses his gratitude for the "purity of a greater than Dickens - Thackeray himself," he is acknowledging the literary prowess and moral integrity present in Thackeray's work. Thackeray's novels, including "Vanity Fair" and "The History of Henry Esmond," are characterized by their incisive social commentary, complex characterizations, and exploration of the human condition. Thackeray's writing often delves into the complexities of human nature, exposing the follies and hypocrisies of society with a keen and unflinching eye.

It is worth noting that the quote also illuminates the mutual respect and admiration between these two authors. Despite any differences in their literary styles or thematic focuses, both Dickens and Thackeray held each other in high regard. Their works and personal correspondence reveal a deep appreciation for each other's talents and contributions to the world of literature.

In the broader context of literary criticism and analysis, this quote prompts readers to consider the concept of greatness in literature. What defines a literary giant? Is it the ability to capture the essence of human experience, to provoke introspection, or to challenge societal norms? Both Dickens and Thackeray have been celebrated for their ability to do all of these things, and more. Their writings have stood the test of time, continuing to resonate with readers across generations.

Furthermore, the quote encourages readers to reflect on the notion of "purity" in literature. In this context, purity may refer to the sincerity and integrity of an author's voice, the moral clarity of their narratives, or the unadulterated emotional impact of their storytelling. Both Dickens and Thackeray possessed the ability to create worlds that felt authentic and characters that felt undeniably real, drawing readers into their narratives with a sense of genuine connection and empathy.

In conclusion, Goldwin Smith's quote serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring legacy of Charles Dickens and William Makepeace Thackeray. Their contributions to literature, their unique voices, and their ability to capture the essence of the human experience continue to inspire and captivate readers. The quote also invites us to consider the themes of purity and greatness in literature, prompting a deeper appreciation for the profound impact of these two literary giants.