Meaning: This quote reflects the moral dilemma of a parent faced with the prospect of providing for their children at any cost, even if it means resorting to theft. The quote is attributed to Ian Smith, a British-born Rhodesian politician who served as the Prime Minister of Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) from 1964 to 1979.

The statement captures the instinctive drive of a parent to ensure the well-being of their children, even in the face of adversity. It raises questions about the lengths to which individuals are willing to go to protect and provide for their loved ones, and the moral implications of such actions.

In the context of the quote, the act of stealing is presented as a means to fulfill the basic human need for sustenance and survival. It elicits a sense of empathy and understanding towards the desperation that may drive someone to commit an act that is typically regarded as immoral or unlawful. The quote challenges the conventional notions of right and wrong, and prompts contemplation on the complex ethical considerations that arise in situations of extreme need.

The quote also speaks to the universal theme of parental love and sacrifice. It underscores the primal instinct of a parent to prioritize the welfare of their children above all else, transcending societal norms and moral codes. The profound emotional and psychological bond between a parent and their child is a powerful force that can compel individuals to make choices that they might otherwise find unthinkable.

Furthermore, the quote invites reflection on the broader social and economic factors that can lead individuals to such extreme measures. It sheds light on the harsh realities faced by many families around the world who struggle to provide the most basic necessities for their children. Poverty, inequality, and systemic injustices can push individuals to the brink, forcing them to make agonizing decisions in the pursuit of survival and well-being.

Ian Smith, the author of the quote, was a controversial figure known for his staunch opposition to majority rule in Rhodesia and his leadership during a tumultuous period in the country's history. His political legacy is marked by deep divisions and enduring debates about his policies and actions. While the quote attributed to him may not directly relate to his political career, it offers a glimpse into the philosophical and ethical considerations that transcend political ideologies.

In conclusion, the quote "If my children were hungry I should think I would steal to feed them" encapsulates the timeless and profound instinct of parental love and sacrifice. It prompts contemplation on the moral complexities of such a scenario and invites empathy towards those who grapple with the harsh realities of providing for their families in challenging circumstances. The quote resonates with the universal human experience of compassion, resilience, and the unwavering commitment to safeguarding the well-being of loved ones.