Meaning: The quote "People in the mass media tend more and more every day to look and act like elected and appointed officials" by L. Smith reflects a growing trend in the media landscape where journalists and media personalities are perceived to mirror the behavior and appearance of political figures. This observation points to the evolving nature of the media industry and the changing dynamics of the relationship between the media and the political sphere.

In today's interconnected world, the influence of mass media on public opinion and political discourse cannot be overstated. Journalists and media personalities are often seen as key influencers in shaping public perception and understanding of political events, policies, and figures. As a result, the line between the media and politics has become increasingly blurred, leading to a convergence of roles and behaviors between the two domains.

One aspect of the quote that can be explored is the idea of journalists and media personalities resembling elected and appointed officials in their appearance. This may refer to the way in which media figures present themselves in a manner that reflects authority, formality, and professionalism, akin to the image projected by political leaders. This can be observed in the attire, demeanor, and public presence of media personalities, which often mirror the polished and authoritative image associated with political figures.

Furthermore, the quote alludes to the notion that media professionals are increasingly adopting the behaviors and practices commonly associated with elected and appointed officials. This could imply that journalists and media personalities are engaging in activities such as public speaking, policy analysis, and political commentary, aligning themselves more closely with the functions traditionally performed by politicians and government officials. In doing so, media figures may be seen as assuming a quasi-political role, wielding influence and power in ways that parallel the actions of elected and appointed officials.

The blurring of boundaries between the media and politics can also be attributed to the emergence of new forms of media, particularly digital platforms and social media. With the rise of digital journalism and online content creation, individuals have gained unprecedented access to public platforms, enabling them to express their views and engage in political discourse. This has led to a democratization of media influence, as ordinary citizens and non-traditional media sources have become significant players in shaping public opinion and political narratives.

Additionally, the increasing polarization of public discourse has contributed to the convergence of the media and political spheres. As political ideologies and partisan viewpoints permeate media content, journalists and media personalities may find themselves aligning with specific political agendas, adopting the rhetoric and tactics commonly associated with partisan politics. This can further reinforce the perception that the media is emulating the behavior of elected and appointed officials, as they become active participants in the political arena rather than impartial observers.

Moreover, the influence of corporate interests and commercial imperatives on the media landscape cannot be overlooked. As media organizations vie for audience attention and advertising revenue, there is a tendency for sensationalism, entertainment, and controversy to drive content creation. This can lead to a convergence of media and political strategies, as both seek to capture public attention and engagement through strategic messaging and narrative framing.

In conclusion, the quote by L. Smith underscores the evolving nature of the media landscape, where the traditional boundaries between the media and politics are becoming increasingly porous. The convergence of roles, behaviors, and practices between media professionals and elected and appointed officials reflects the complex interplay of factors such as digital media, political polarization, and commercial imperatives. As the media continues to shape public discourse and influence political narratives, it is imperative to critically examine the implications of this convergence for the integrity and independence of the media as a democratic institution.