Meaning: The quote by Michael Beschloss touches on the evolution of presidential nominating conventions in the United States over the years. It highlights the significant changes that have taken place in the way these conventions operated from the 1830s to the 1950s. To fully understand the quote and its implications, it is essential to delve into the historical context of presidential nominating conventions and their evolution over time.

In the early 19th century, the process of selecting presidential candidates was quite different from the highly orchestrated and media-driven conventions we are familiar with today. Prior to the 1830s, presidential candidates were often chosen by congressional caucuses or state legislatures. This process lacked transparency and often resulted in backroom deals and political maneuvering.

The 1830s marked a significant shift with the emergence of nominating conventions as a means to select presidential candidates. These conventions were initially characterized by a sense of genuine deliberation and decision-making. Delegates from various states would gather to discuss and debate the merits of different candidates before ultimately selecting a nominee. It was during this period that the quote suggests conventions "actually did real business." The process was more organic and reflective of the democratic principles upon which the nation was founded.

As the 19th century progressed, the role of nominating conventions continued to evolve. The rise of political parties as organized entities further shaped the conventions, with parties exerting more influence over the selection of delegates and the nomination process. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, nominating conventions had become highly orchestrated events, with party leaders and political operatives playing a significant role in shaping the outcome.

The 1950s marked a turning point in the history of nominating conventions. The rise of television and mass media transformed the conventions into highly publicized and scripted affairs. While the quote does not explicitly mention this evolution, it is implied that the conventions of this era had shifted away from the "real business" of selecting candidates to a more performative and symbolic function.

Michael Beschloss, a noted historian and author, has extensively studied and written about the history of the U.S. presidency and the political processes that shape it. His quote likely reflects his observations about the changing nature of nominating conventions and the impact of these changes on the political landscape.

In conclusion, the quote by Michael Beschloss offers a glimpse into the historical evolution of presidential nominating conventions in the United States. It underscores the transformation of these conventions from genuine forums for deliberation and decision-making to highly orchestrated and media-driven spectacles. By examining the historical context and evolution of nominating conventions, we gain valuable insights into the changing dynamics of American politics and the ways in which the process of selecting presidential candidates has evolved over time.