Meaning: The quote reflects the complex relationship between scientific advancements and political motivations. It suggests that scientific developments, such as technological innovations or discoveries, often occur independently of political influence. However, once these developments have taken place, political actors may seek to manipulate or exploit them for their own purposes. This dynamic between science and politics has been a recurring theme throughout history, shaping the course of technological progress and influencing international affairs.

In the context of the quote, E. Thompson, a historian, appears to be highlighting the idea that scientific progress and political agendas are not inherently linked. Instead, he suggests that the political justifications for these advancements are constructed after the fact, based on the existing scientific achievements. This perspective invites us to consider the ways in which scientific breakthroughs can be co-opted by political interests, potentially altering their intended purpose or impact.

One of the most notable examples of the intertwining of scientific developments and political motivations is the race to build and harness nuclear weapons during the 20th century. The development of nuclear technology was driven by scientific research and technological innovation, particularly in the fields of physics and engineering. However, as World War II unfolded, the political and military implications of nuclear technology became increasingly significant.

The Manhattan Project, a massive and secretive research and development effort during the war, exemplifies the intersection of scientific progress and political imperatives. The project's primary goal was the development of the atomic bomb, a feat achieved through the collaborative efforts of scientists, engineers, and military personnel. While the scientific and technical aspects of creating the bomb were paramount, the project was ultimately driven by the geopolitical and military considerations of the time.

Following the successful testing and deployment of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the political ramifications of nuclear technology became a central concern for global powers. The emergence of nuclear weapons fundamentally altered the dynamics of international relations, leading to the Cold War and the arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union. The scientific achievement of nuclear fission had profound political and strategic implications, shaping the course of world history for decades to come.

In a broader sense, the quote by E. Thompson can also be applied to other scientific and technological advancements, beyond the realm of nuclear weapons. Throughout history, innovations in areas such as medicine, communications, and transportation have often been driven by scientific inquiry and exploration. However, the ways in which these advancements are utilized and regulated are heavily influenced by political considerations and societal values.

For example, the development of new pharmaceutical drugs or medical procedures may be rooted in scientific research and innovation, but their accessibility and distribution are often shaped by economic and political factors. Similarly, the deployment of new technologies, such as the internet or artificial intelligence, raises complex questions about governance, privacy, and security, reflecting the intertwining of scientific progress and political imperatives.

In conclusion, E. Thompson's quote underscores the intricate relationship between scientific advancements and political motivations. By recognizing that scientific developments can precede and exist independently of political justifications, we gain a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between science and politics. This perspective invites critical examination of how scientific progress is harnessed and leveraged within the broader context of societal, economic, and geopolitical forces.