Meaning: The quote by E. Thompson, a renowned historian, reflects on the open attitude of the United States towards information and discussion. It highlights the importance of this attitude to the world while also pointing out a potential shortcoming – that information and discussion often come too late, after effective decisions have been made. This quote captures a complex reality about the U.S.'s approach to decision-making and the impact it has on the global stage.

The first part of the quote acknowledges the U.S.'s open attitude towards information and discussion. This openness has been a defining characteristic of American society and governance, rooted in the principles of freedom of speech and the press. It has allowed for a vibrant exchange of ideas, diverse perspectives, and a relatively free flow of information. This openness has been a source of admiration for many around the world, as it stands in stark contrast to the more closed or controlled information environments found in other countries.

The quote also suggests that this open attitude is not only admirable but also important to the world. The U.S.'s willingness to engage in open dialogue and provide access to information has had far-reaching effects, influencing global discussions on various issues, from politics and economics to culture and technology. This openness has contributed to the U.S.'s reputation as a beacon of free expression and a champion of democratic values.

However, the latter part of the quote introduces a critical perspective. It implies that despite the U.S.'s open attitude, there is a timing issue when it comes to the dissemination of information and the conduct of discussions. The phrase "after the effective decision has been made" suggests that the impact of information and discussion may be limited by the timing of their occurrence. In other words, by the time information and discussions reach a critical mass, decisions may have already been made, potentially limiting their influence.

This observation raises important questions about the effectiveness of open dialogue and the accessibility of information in the decision-making process. It prompts us to consider whether the U.S.'s open attitude, while commendable, could benefit from a more proactive approach to information sharing and discussion. It also invites us to reflect on how the timing of information and discussions can impact the outcomes of decisions, especially on a global scale.

In the context of global events and international relations, the timing of information and discussion becomes even more significant. Decisions made by the U.S. government can have profound implications for other countries and regions, making it crucial for timely and meaningful engagement with the international community. The quote suggests that while the U.S. may lead in openness, there is room for improvement in ensuring that information and discussions are timely and influential in shaping decisions that affect the world.

E. Thompson's quote captures the nuanced relationship between openness, information, discussion, and decision-making in the U.S. context. It prompts us to consider the broader implications of the U.S.'s approach to these elements and its impact on the global stage. As the world continues to grapple with complex challenges and interconnected issues, understanding and addressing the dynamics highlighted in the quote will be essential for fostering effective communication, collaboration, and decision-making on a global scale.

In conclusion, E. Thompson's quote offers a thought-provoking reflection on the U.S.'s open attitude towards information and discussion, highlighting its importance to the world while also raising concerns about the timing of these elements in the decision-making process. It invites us to consider the implications of these dynamics in the U.S. and global context, prompting critical examination of the relationship between openness, information, discussion, and decision-making.