Meaning: This quote by Mark Bittman, a renowned food journalist and author, sheds light on the impact of farm subsidies and the collaboration between agribusiness and Congress on the dominance of certain agricultural products in the United States. The quote specifically mentions soy, corn, cattle, and chicken as the beneficiaries of this collaboration, highlighting the central role these products play in the country's agricultural landscape. Bittman also alludes to the negative consequences of this dominance, referring to the "cycle of dietary and planetary destruction" that ensued as a result.

The reference to farm subsidies underscores the significant role of government support in shaping the agricultural industry. Farm subsidies are financial assistance provided to farmers and agribusinesses by the government to supplement their income, manage the supply of agricultural commodities, and influence market prices. While the intention behind these subsidies is often to support farmers and ensure a stable food supply, their impact on the agricultural landscape can be far-reaching and complex.

The collaboration between agribusiness and Congress, as mentioned in the quote, points to the influence of powerful agricultural interests on policymaking. Agribusinesses, which include large-scale farming operations, food processing companies, and agricultural input suppliers, have the resources and influence to shape agricultural policies and regulations to their advantage. This collaboration has contributed to the promotion and prioritization of certain agricultural products, such as soy, corn, cattle, and chicken, through various means, including subsidies, trade policies, and marketing efforts.

The quote's reference to soy, corn, and cattle as "king," along with chicken joining them on the throne, reflects the significant dominance of these commodities in the American diet and food system. Soy and corn are key ingredients in processed foods, animal feed, and biofuels, while cattle and chicken are primary sources of meat consumption. The prioritization of these commodities has not only shaped dietary patterns but also had broader environmental and social implications.

Furthermore, the phrase "the cycle of dietary and planetary destruction" alludes to the multifaceted impact of the dominance of these agricultural products. From a dietary perspective, the focus on these commodities has been linked to the rise of highly processed and unhealthy food products, contributing to public health issues such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. Moreover, the intensive production of livestock, fueled by the demand for cattle and chicken, has raised concerns about the environmental impact of large-scale animal agriculture, including deforestation, greenhouse gas emissions, and water pollution.

Bittman's assertion that "the thing we're only realizing just now" suggests a growing awareness of the long-term consequences of the agricultural practices and dietary patterns that have been influenced by farm subsidies and the collaboration between agribusiness and Congress. As society becomes more attuned to the interconnectedness of food, health, and the environment, there is a heightened recognition of the need to reevaluate and reshape the agricultural system to address these challenges.

In conclusion, Mark Bittman's quote underscores the complex interplay of farm subsidies, agribusiness influence, and the dominance of specific agricultural products in shaping the American food system. It highlights the far-reaching implications of these dynamics, from dietary patterns to environmental sustainability. The recognition of these issues serves as a call to action for reexamining agricultural policies, promoting diversified and sustainable food production, and fostering healthier and more environmentally conscious dietary choices.