Meaning: The quote by Sherwood Boehlert, a politician, addresses the issue of reducing oil consumption in the United States. In this quote, Boehlert emphasizes the reluctance of people to support an increase in gas taxes, which he sees as a significant obstacle to addressing the problem of oil consumption. Instead, he advocates for the implementation and enforcement of fuel economy standards as the most effective tool available to the nation in reducing its dependence on oil.

Boehlert's observation about the lack of popular support for raising gas taxes reflects a common sentiment among politicians and policymakers. Historically, proposals to increase gas taxes have often been met with resistance from the public due to concerns about the potential impact on personal finances and the overall cost of living. This opposition can make it challenging for lawmakers to garner the necessary support for such measures, despite their potential to reduce oil consumption and mitigate environmental damage.

In the absence of widespread support for increased gas taxes, Boehlert argues that fuel economy standards offer a viable alternative for curbing oil consumption. Fuel economy standards, also known as corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards, regulate the average fuel efficiency of vehicles sold in the United States. By setting requirements for the fuel efficiency of cars and trucks, these standards aim to reduce the overall demand for gasoline and, consequently, lower the nation's reliance on oil.

Boehlert's assertion that fuel economy standards are the "only effective tool" available to address oil consumption in the nation underscores the perceived limitations of other approaches. Given the political challenges associated with raising gas taxes, he suggests that fuel economy standards represent a more feasible and impactful strategy for achieving the desired reduction in oil consumption. This perspective aligns with the ongoing debates and policy discussions surrounding energy and environmental issues in the United States.

The quote also highlights the urgency of addressing the "dangerous and ever-growing consumption of oil." With growing concerns about climate change, air pollution, and national security risks associated with oil dependence, the need to reduce oil consumption has become a pressing issue. By emphasizing the significance of this problem, Boehlert underscores the importance of identifying practical and effective solutions to mitigate the adverse effects of oil consumption on the environment and national interests.

In conclusion, Sherwood Boehlert's quote encapsulates the complex challenges and policy considerations related to reducing oil consumption in the United States. His recognition of the political obstacles to raising gas taxes and his advocacy for fuel economy standards as a viable alternative reflect the ongoing efforts to address energy and environmental issues at the national level. As policymakers and stakeholders continue to navigate these issues, Boehlert's perspective serves as a reminder of the need for pragmatic and innovative approaches to achieve sustainable and responsible energy practices.