Meaning: The quote by Jim Bolger, a New Zealand statesman, reflects on the volatility of public opinion and the electorate's ability to swing dramatically in one direction. This statement carries significant implications for the understanding of political dynamics and the interpretation of polling data.

Bolger's observation highlights the potential for sudden and significant shifts in public opinion. It suggests that a series of consistent polling results can be disrupted by a sudden, unexpected change, indicating that the electorate is more volatile than commonly perceived. This volatility can have far-reaching impacts on political decision-making, campaign strategies, and governance.

One possible interpretation of Bolger's quote is that it serves as a cautionary note to political leaders and analysts. It underscores the need to approach polling data with a degree of skepticism, recognizing that public sentiment can quickly and unexpectedly change. This insight is particularly relevant in the context of election campaigns, where polling data often guides strategic decisions and messaging.

Furthermore, the quote prompts a consideration of the factors that contribute to electoral volatility. Changes in the socio-political landscape, economic conditions, and external events can all influence public opinion. Additionally, the role of media, social media, and other communication channels in shaping and amplifying public sentiment cannot be overlooked. These factors can contribute to the rapid and significant swings in public opinion that Bolger's quote alludes to.

In the realm of political communication and messaging, Bolger's observation underscores the importance of adaptability and responsiveness. Political actors and campaigns must be prepared to recalibrate their strategies in response to sudden shifts in public opinion. Moreover, the quote emphasizes the need for continuous engagement with the electorate to understand and address the underlying reasons for such volatility.

From a broader perspective, the quote invites reflection on the nature of democracy and the dynamics of representation. It raises questions about the extent to which elected officials and political institutions are equipped to navigate and respond to a volatile electorate. It also underscores the need for robust and resilient democratic processes that can accommodate and reflect the changing will of the people.

In conclusion, Jim Bolger's quote encapsulates a keen insight into the volatile nature of public opinion and the electorate. It serves as a reminder of the inherent unpredictability of political dynamics and the challenges it presents to political actors and analysts. Understanding and adapting to electoral volatility is essential for the effective functioning of democracy and the legitimacy of political decision-making.