Meaning: The quote by Arthur Boyd, an Australian artist, embodies the concept of a society where everyone has access to the basic necessities of life without the burden of ownership. It suggests a vision of a world where material possessions are not a measure of one's well-being, and where the focus is on ensuring that everyone has enough to live a fulfilling life. This sentiment reflects a broader philosophical and social debate about the nature of ownership, wealth, and inequality, and it offers an alternative perspective on how society could be organized.

Boyd's quote touches upon the idea of a post-scarcity society, where resources are abundant enough to meet everyone's needs. In such a society, the emphasis shifts from individual ownership to collective stewardship of resources. This concept challenges the prevailing capitalist notions of private property and accumulation of wealth, advocating instead for a more equitable distribution of resources.

The notion of "nobody owned anything" in Boyd's quote suggests a departure from the traditional concept of ownership. In this context, the idea of ownership is not just limited to personal possessions, but also extends to the means of production and natural resources. Boyd's vision implies a radical reimagining of the economic and social structures that underpin modern society.

The phrase "but they didn't starve" underscores the fundamental principle of ensuring that everyone's basic needs are met. It emphasizes the importance of eradicating poverty and hunger, irrespective of individual ownership. This sentiment aligns with the concept of a universal basic income or a social safety net that guarantees a standard of living for all members of society.

Boyd's reference to "enough paint and enough pianos and everything else" speaks to the idea of abundance and access. It implies a world where creative expression and cultural enrichment are not constrained by economic barriers. In this vision, artistic and cultural resources are freely available to all, fostering a society where creativity and innovation can flourish without the limitations of ownership and exclusivity.

This quote also reflects Boyd's personal experiences and artistic philosophy. As an artist, Boyd may have been influenced by his own creative endeavors and the role of art in society. His perspective on ownership and access to resources may have been shaped by his observations of inequality and the impact of economic disparities on artistic expression.

In the broader context of social and political discourse, Boyd's quote contributes to discussions on alternative economic models and social welfare systems. It challenges the status quo and prompts reflection on the values that underpin contemporary societies. The quote invites consideration of how different approaches to ownership and resource distribution could shape the fabric of society.

Ultimately, Boyd's quote serves as a thought-provoking commentary on the intersection of ownership, equality, and human well-being. It inspires contemplation about the possibility of a world where material abundance coexists with social equity, and where the pursuit of individual wealth is not at the expense of collective welfare. Whether viewed as an idealistic aspiration or a radical reimagining of societal norms, Boyd's words provoke dialogue about the potential for a more inclusive and humane future.