Meaning: This quote by Georg Brandes encapsulates the distinction between the world of figures and the world of values. Georg Brandes, a Danish critic and scholar, was known for his influential role in introducing and popularizing modern European literature in Scandinavia. His work often delved into the realms of culture, art, and philosophy, and this quote reflects his contemplation on the dichotomy between numerical data and moral or ethical principles.

In the world of figures, Brandes likely refers to the realm of quantifiable data, mathematics, and statistics. This domain is governed by numerical values, measurements, and calculations. It is a space where precision and objectivity are paramount, and where phenomena are often reduced to numerical representations. In this context, individuals may feel comfortable, at home, as they navigate through the concrete and measurable aspects of the world. This world of figures often pertains to the scientific and mathematical realms, where facts and evidence are paramount, and where truth is sought through empirical observation and experimentation.

Conversely, the world of values encompasses the moral, ethical, and philosophical dimensions of human existence. In this realm, individuals grapple with questions of right and wrong, justice, virtue, and the meaning of life. Unlike the world of figures, the world of values is characterized by subjectivity, nuance, and the complexities of human experience. It is a space where emotions, beliefs, and ethical considerations hold sway, and where individuals must navigate the often ambiguous and conflicting nature of human values. In this world, individuals are often challenged to confront the ethical implications of their actions, to consider the welfare of others, and to contemplate the greater purpose and meaning of their lives.

Brandes' assertion that he was at home in the world of figures but not in that of values suggests a personal affinity or comfort with the realm of quantifiable data and numerical analysis. This may reflect his scholarly pursuits and his engagement with literature and culture from a critical and analytical perspective. It is possible that Brandes felt more at ease navigating the tangible and measurable aspects of his intellectual endeavors, while grappling with the complexities of human values and ethical considerations posed a greater challenge.

From a broader perspective, this quote invites contemplation on the tension between these two realms and the ways in which individuals navigate and reconcile them in their lives. It raises questions about the interplay between empirical data and moral principles, and the ways in which individuals negotiate the demands of both worlds in their personal, professional, and intellectual pursuits.

Ultimately, Brandes' quote serves as a thought-provoking reflection on the dichotomy between the world of figures and the world of values, inviting individuals to consider their own relationship to these distinct but interconnected spheres of human experience.