The notion that we won the war against Iraq is like saying we won a war against Arizona. I mean, the fact of the matter is it's not that big of a country. Nobody, I don't think, had any notion that we would do anything but win it.

Profession: Politician

Topics: War, Country, Fact, Iraq, Saying,

Wallpaper of quote
Views: 19
Meaning: This quote by Carol Moseley Braun, the first African American woman to be elected to the US Senate, provides a thought-provoking perspective on the 1991 Gulf War. In this quote, Braun compares the idea of winning the war against Iraq to winning a war against Arizona, highlighting the disparity in size and power between the United States and Iraq. Let's explore the context and implications of this quote in more detail.

The Gulf War, also known as Operation Desert Storm, was a major conflict that took place between August 1990 and February 1991. The war was triggered by Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, which was seen as a threat to the stability and security of the region. The United States led a coalition of nations in a military campaign to liberate Kuwait and push back the Iraqi forces. The war resulted in a decisive victory for the coalition forces, with Iraq suffering significant military and infrastructural damage.

Braun's comparison of winning the war against Iraq to winning a war against Arizona is a striking analogy that underscores the overwhelming military superiority of the United States over Iraq. Arizona, a state in the southwestern region of the U.S., is obviously much smaller in size and population compared to the entire nation of Iraq. By equating the victory in the Gulf War to winning a war against a single U.S. state, Braun highlights the vast power differential between the two adversaries.

Furthermore, Braun's use of this analogy can be interpreted as a critique of the framing of the conflict and its portrayal in the media and political discourse. The quote suggests that the outcome of the war was almost a foregone conclusion due to the immense military capabilities of the United States compared to Iraq. It challenges the notion of the Gulf War as a heroic and hard-won victory, instead emphasizing the significant disparity in resources and capabilities between the belligerents.

Moreover, Braun's perspective raises important questions about the ethics and implications of military intervention, particularly when there is such a pronounced power imbalance between the parties involved. The quote invites reflection on the concept of "winning" in the context of asymmetrical conflicts, where one side's victory may be perceived as inevitable and lopsided due to overwhelming superiority in military might.

In addition, Braun's background as a politician and public figure adds weight to her commentary on the Gulf War. As a former U.S. Senator and a prominent advocate for social justice and equality, her insights carry a degree of authority and relevance in the political and social spheres. Her perspective provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing discourse surrounding the Gulf War and its legacy, prompting a critical reevaluation of the framing and narratives surrounding the conflict.

Overall, Carol Moseley Braun's quote offers a thought-provoking critique of the Gulf War and the dynamics of power and victory in asymmetrical conflicts. By likening the war against Iraq to a hypothetical war against a single U.S. state, she draws attention to the vast disparity in size and military capabilities between the United States and Iraq, challenging the traditional narrative of the war as a hard-fought victory. Her perspective encourages a deeper examination of the ethical and political implications of military interventions and power differentials in global conflicts.

0.0 / 5

0 Reviews

5
(0)

4
(0)

3
(0)

2
(0)

1
(0)