Meaning: This quote by Kingman Brewster, Jr. humorously captures the often cautious and conservative nature of diplomatic communication, particularly in the context of briefing papers for ambassadors. Brewster, a respected educator and former president of Yale University, offers a wry commentary on the purpose and effect of briefing papers in the realm of diplomatic discourse. In dissecting this quote, we can explore the significance of briefing papers, the role of ambassadors, and the delicate balance between diplomacy and discretion.

In diplomatic circles, a briefing paper serves as a concise and informative document that provides essential background information, analysis, and recommendations on a particular issue or topic. These papers are designed to prepare ambassadors and other high-ranking officials for meetings, negotiations, and public appearances, ensuring that they are well-informed and equipped to represent their country's interests effectively. However, as Brewster suggests, the primary function of a briefing paper may also be to prevent the ambassador from making potentially damaging or embarrassing statements. This reflects the inherent tension between the need for transparency and the imperative of discretion in diplomatic communication.

The quote's assertion that briefing papers may aim to prevent ambassadors from saying anything at all highlights the cautious and risk-averse nature of diplomatic communication. Given the high stakes and potential ramifications of diplomatic exchanges, there is a strong emphasis on carefully crafted and vetted messaging. Ambassadors are often under immense pressure to convey their government's positions with precision and tact, avoiding missteps that could lead to misunderstandings, conflicts, or diplomatic crises. Briefing papers, therefore, play a critical role in guiding and constraining the ambassadors' language and expressions, steering them away from potential indiscretions or controversial statements.

Brewster's humorous take on the true object of briefing papers sheds light on the complex dynamics at play in diplomatic communication. While these documents are intended to inform and empower ambassadors, they can also serve as a form of bureaucratic control and risk management. The careful vetting and scripting of diplomatic messages through briefing papers reflect the interplay between the need for openness and the imperative of diplomatic caution. In this sense, briefing papers can be seen as a tool for managing the delicate balance between diplomatic transparency and the need to avoid diplomatic blunders.

Beyond the humorous tone, Brewster's quote raises important questions about the nature of diplomatic communication and the role of ambassadors as representatives of their respective nations. It underscores the immense responsibility placed on ambassadors to navigate complex international relations while adhering to strict guidelines and protocols. In this context, briefing papers serve as both a shield and a guide for ambassadors, shaping their communication and actions in line with their government's diplomatic objectives and strategies.

In conclusion, Kingman Brewster, Jr.'s quote humorously encapsulates the intricate dynamics of diplomatic communication and the role of briefing papers in guiding and constraining ambassadors' messaging. It sheds light on the delicate balance between transparency and discretion in diplomatic exchanges, highlighting the multifaceted functions and effects of briefing papers. Ultimately, this quote offers a thought-provoking insight into the complexities of diplomatic communication and the challenges faced by ambassadors in representing their countries on the global stage.