Meaning: The quote "But once the person is selected, at that point that person is independent" by Stephen Breyer, a judge, encompasses the principle of judicial independence within the legal system. This idea highlights the notion that once a judge is appointed to the bench, they are expected to operate independently, free from external influence or pressure. This concept is fundamental to the rule of law and the functioning of a fair and impartial judiciary.

Judicial independence is a cornerstone of the modern legal system, ensuring that judges are able to make decisions based on the law and facts, rather than being swayed by political, social, or economic considerations. This principle is essential for upholding the separation of powers and maintaining the integrity of the judicial branch.

When a judge is selected or appointed, they are entrusted with the responsibility of interpreting and applying the law in a fair and impartial manner. This requires them to be free from interference or coercion, whether it be from the executive, legislative, or any other external source. Judicial independence safeguards the judiciary from undue influence and preserves its role as a check on the powers of the other branches of government.

The idea of judicial independence is not only crucial for ensuring the fair administration of justice, but it also contributes to upholding public trust and confidence in the legal system. When individuals have faith in the independence of the judiciary, they are more likely to respect and comply with court decisions, knowing that they are made without bias or external pressure.

Furthermore, judicial independence is essential for protecting the rights and liberties of individuals. When judges are free to apply the law impartially, without fear of reprisal or favoritism, they can ensure that justice is served and that the rights of all individuals are upheld. This is particularly important in cases involving controversial or sensitive issues, where the impartiality of the judiciary is vital.

In practice, judicial independence is upheld through various mechanisms and principles. For example, judges are often appointed through a process designed to minimize political influence, such as nomination by a non-partisan commission or confirmation by a legislative body. Once appointed, judges are typically granted tenure, which protects them from arbitrary removal or demotion, allowing them to make decisions without fear of losing their position.

Additionally, ethical codes and professional standards guide judges in their conduct, emphasizing the importance of impartiality and independence in their decision-making. These standards often require judges to recuse themselves from cases where their impartiality may be compromised, further safeguarding the integrity of the judicial process.

However, it is important to note that judicial independence does not mean that judges are immune from accountability. While they are free from external influence in their decision-making, judges are still subject to oversight to ensure that they adhere to the law and ethical standards. This oversight may come from judicial review by higher courts, disciplinary bodies, or other mechanisms designed to maintain the integrity of the judiciary.

In conclusion, the quote by Stephen Breyer encapsulates the fundamental principle of judicial independence, emphasizing the importance of a judiciary that is free from external influence once judges are appointed. This concept is vital for upholding the rule of law, protecting individual rights, and maintaining public trust in the legal system. By ensuring the independence of the judiciary, societies can uphold the principles of fairness, justice, and the rule of law.