Meaning: This quote by James Broughton, an American poet and filmmaker, provides a somewhat cynical yet insightful view of the landscape of poetry. It categorizes poets into different groups, each with its own connotations and implications. Broughton's classification indicates a hierarchy of authenticity and skill within the world of poetry, suggesting that only a select few can be considered "real poets."

The first group mentioned is the "would-be poets," which likely refers to those who aspire to be poets but have not yet fully developed their craft. These individuals may be dabbling in poetry as a hobby or experimenting with writing but have not yet established themselves as serious practitioners of the art form. They may lack the experience or skill to be considered genuine poets by the standards of the quote.

The next category, "workshop poets," suggests poets who have engaged in formal training or workshops to improve their skills. This may imply a level of dedication and commitment to honing their craft, but it could also carry the implication that their work is formulaic or derivative due to the influence of structured learning environments.

The "promising poets" are likely seen as those who show potential and talent in their writing but have not yet fully realized their abilities. This group may encompass emerging poets who are beginning to make a mark in the poetry world but have not yet reached a level of maturity and expertise that would classify them as "real poets."

The term "lovesick poets" suggests a focus on themes of love and romance in their poetry, perhaps indicating a preoccupation with personal emotions and experiences rather than a broader exploration of themes and subjects. This label may carry a certain dismissiveness, implying that their poetry is emotionally driven and lacks depth or complexity.

"University poets" likely refers to those who are associated with academic institutions and may be influenced by scholarly or intellectual approaches to poetry. This category may suggest a level of elitism or detachment from the broader public audience, focusing more on academic discourse and literary theory than on genuine artistic expression.

Finally, the quote acknowledges "a few real poets," implying that only a small minority of poets achieve the status of being considered genuine or authentic in their craft. This suggests that Broughton holds a high standard for what constitutes a "real poet," one who possesses a certain level of originality, depth, and mastery of the art form.

It's important to note that Broughton's categorization may reflect his own perspective and biases as a poet and filmmaker. The quote presents a somewhat jaded view of the poetry world, emphasizing the rarity of true talent and authenticity. However, it also provokes contemplation about the diversity of voices and approaches within the realm of poetry, as well as the subjective nature of defining what makes a poet "real."

In conclusion, James Broughton's quote provides an intriguing lens through which to view the world of poetry, highlighting the various personas and archetypes that exist within the realm of poets. It prompts consideration of the qualities and criteria that define a "real poet," while also inviting reflection on the diversity and complexity of the poetic landscape. Whether one agrees with Broughton's categorizations or not, the quote serves as a thought-provoking exploration of the multifaceted nature of poetry and the artists who inhabit this creative sphere.