Meaning: This thought-provoking quote by environmentalist David Brower raises a critical concern about the long-term consequences of our current energy consumption patterns. Brower, a prominent figure in the environmental movement, was known for his advocacy for conservation and preservation of natural resources. In this quote, he challenges the notion of prioritizing short-term convenience and luxury at the expense of potential catastrophic outcomes for future generations.

The first part of the quote, "Is the minor convenience of allowing the present generation the luxury of doubling its energy consumption every 10 years worth," highlights the relentless increase in energy consumption that has characterized modern society. Brower draws attention to the seemingly minor benefits and conveniences that drive this consumption growth, questioning whether the temporary advantages justify the long-term costs.

The phrase "doubling its energy consumption every 10 years" underscores the alarming rate at which human society has been depleting natural resources and increasing its environmental impact. This exponential growth in energy consumption has significant implications for the planet's ecosystems, natural habitats, and overall sustainability.

Brower then emphasizes the gravity of the situation by posing the question, "worth the major hazard of exposing the next 20,000 generations to this lethal waste?" This portion of the quote underscores the potential magnitude of the problem. By referencing "20,000 generations," Brower shifts the focus from immediate consequences to the enduring impact of current actions on future societies.

The term "lethal waste" alludes to the hazardous byproducts and environmental pollutants generated by excessive energy consumption, such as radioactive waste from nuclear power plants, carbon emissions from fossil fuel combustion, and other toxic substances. Brower's use of the word "lethal" conveys the seriousness of the threat posed by these byproducts, suggesting that they have the potential to cause harm and even death to living organisms and ecosystems.

By juxtaposing the "minor convenience" of the present generation with the "major hazard" faced by future generations, Brower challenges readers to consider the ethical and moral implications of their energy consumption choices. He urges society to weigh the immediate benefits against the long-term risks and to prioritize the well-being of future generations in decision-making processes.

In summary, David Brower's quote serves as a poignant reminder of the interconnectedness of human actions and their consequences across time. It prompts individuals and policymakers to critically evaluate the sustainability of current energy consumption patterns and to consider the enduring impact on the environment and future generations. This message continues to resonate in contemporary discussions about climate change, resource management, and the ethical responsibilities of society towards the planet and its inhabitants.