Meaning: Luther Burbank, an American environmentalist, captured a profound truth about human nature in his quote, "Less than fifteen per cent of the people do any original thinking on any subject. The greatest torture in the world for most people is to think." This statement encapsulates the idea that critical thinking and original thought are rare qualities, and for many individuals, engaging in deep contemplation or intellectual exploration is an uncomfortable and taxing process.

Burbank's assertion regarding the scarcity of original thinking resonates with the broader discourse on critical thinking and creativity in society. The concept of original thinking, or the ability to generate novel ideas or perspectives, is often celebrated and valued as a hallmark of intellect and innovation. However, Burbank's suggestion that only a small fraction of the population engages in such thinking underscores the challenges and limitations that hinder widespread intellectual curiosity and originality.

One interpretation of Burbank's quote is that the majority of people rely on established beliefs, conventional wisdom, and received knowledge rather than embarking on independent intellectual inquiry. This reliance on existing ideas and perspectives may stem from various factors, including social conditioning, educational practices, and cognitive biases. Consequently, the pursuit of original thinking becomes a daunting task for many individuals, as it requires breaking free from ingrained patterns of thought and venturing into uncharted intellectual territory.

Burbank's characterization of thinking as "the greatest torture in the world for most people" offers a striking portrayal of the aversion to deep contemplation and introspection. This aversion may be attributed to the discomfort and cognitive effort associated with challenging one's own assumptions, confronting complex issues, or grappling with uncertainty. Moreover, the quote implies that for a significant portion of the population, the act of thinking critically and independently is not only arduous but also emotionally taxing, perhaps due to the potential for cognitive dissonance or the disruption of familiar mental frameworks.

From an environmentalist perspective, Burbank's quote may also reflect concerns about the implications of limited original thinking on the stewardship of the natural world. If only a small fraction of individuals engage in innovative and forward-thinking approaches to environmental conservation and sustainability, the collective capacity to address pressing ecological challenges may be hindered. This interpretation underscores the broader societal ramifications of the scarcity of original thinking, particularly in domains that require creative solutions and visionary perspectives.

In conclusion, Luther Burbank's quote offers a thought-provoking commentary on the scarcity of original thinking and the perceived aversion to deep contemplation among the majority of people. By highlighting the rarity and perceived discomfort associated with independent intellectual inquiry, Burbank's words prompt reflection on the broader societal implications of limited critical thinking and creativity. As we grapple with the challenges of fostering a culture of originality and intellectual exploration, Burbank's quote serves as a poignant reminder of the value and necessity of cultivating a society that embraces and nurtures the pursuit of independent thought and creative expression.