Meaning: This quote by Jane Alexander, the esteemed actress and former chair of the National Endowment for the Arts, delves into the complex and subjective nature of obscenity. By expressing uncertainty about how to define obscenity and acknowledging that its definition can vary depending on the era, Alexander highlights the ever-changing and culturally contingent nature of this concept.

Obscenity is a term that has been the subject of much debate and legal scrutiny throughout history. It refers to anything that is considered offensive, indecent, or morally repugnant, particularly in the context of public expression or representation. The definition of obscenity is inherently subjective and varies across different societies, cultures, and time periods. What may be considered obscene in one era or culture may not be viewed in the same light in another.

In the United States, the legal definition of obscenity has been shaped by various court rulings, particularly the landmark case of Miller v. California in 1973. In this case, the Supreme Court established the three-pronged Miller test to determine whether material is obscene and therefore not protected by the First Amendment. The test considers whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work appeals to prurient interests, depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

Despite legal attempts to define and regulate obscenity, the concept remains elusive and malleable. Alexander's observation about the shifting definition of obscenity in different ages resonates with the idea that societal norms and values play a significant role in shaping perceptions of what is considered obscene. What may have been deemed obscene in one era could be widely accepted in another.

Furthermore, advancements in technology and the proliferation of media have also contributed to the evolving landscape of obscenity. The internet and digital platforms have expanded the reach of content, leading to discussions about the regulation of online obscenity and the blurred lines between what is considered private versus public expression.

In addition to legal and cultural considerations, the artistic realm has often grappled with questions of obscenity. Artists have pushed boundaries and challenged societal norms through their work, leading to controversies and censorship attempts. The intersection of art and obscenity raises fundamental questions about freedom of expression, artistic intent, and the impact of creative works on the public.

It is within this complex and multifaceted context that Jane Alexander's quote provokes contemplation. Her acknowledgment of the subjective and age-dependent nature of obscenity encourages reflection on the fluidity of moral standards and the importance of considering historical and cultural contexts when evaluating what is deemed obscene.

In conclusion, Jane Alexander's quote encapsulates the nuanced and evolving nature of obscenity. It serves as a reminder that the definition of obscenity is not fixed but rather influenced by societal attitudes, cultural shifts, and historical perspectives. As discussions about obscenity continue to unfold, it remains essential to approach the topic with an understanding of its complexity and subjectivity.