Meaning: This quote by Samuel Alexander, a renowned philosopher, delves into the complex and often contradictory nature of human desires and expectations. It suggests that there is a dynamic interplay between the anticipation of an outcome (expectation) and the emotional longing for that outcome (desire). The interval between the two, according to Alexander, is not simply a void, but rather a space filled with fluctuating degrees of emotional intensity.

At its core, the quote speaks to the intricate and at times paradoxical relationship between our hopes and our wants. To fully grasp the depth of Alexander's assertion, it is essential to delve into the philosophical and psychological underpinnings of expectations and desires, as well as their role in shaping human experiences and motivations.

Expectations can be seen as the cognitive anticipations of future events or outcomes. They are often rooted in past experiences, societal norms, and individual beliefs. On the other hand, desires are the emotional longings for something that is perceived as lacking in one's current state. They are often linked to pleasure, fulfillment, and the pursuit of happiness.

The interval between expectation and desire, as Alexander suggests, is not a static or linear progression from one state to the other. Instead, it is a nuanced and fluid space where individuals experience a range of emotional states. This can manifest as a fluctuation between the warmth of anticipation and the coldness of unfulfilled longing, or vice versa. In essence, it highlights the complexity of human emotions and the dynamic nature of our inner experiences.

From a psychological standpoint, this quote sheds light on the intricate interplay between cognitive and emotional processes. Expectations are often driven by rational thought and logical reasoning, while desires are rooted in the realm of emotions and subjective experiences. The coexistence of these two elements creates a rich tapestry of human experience, where individuals navigate the tension between what they anticipate and what they yearn for.

Moreover, the quote invites contemplation on the nature of satisfaction and contentment. It suggests that the fulfillment of desires may not always align with the initial expectations, and vice versa. This dissonance between anticipation and longing can lead to a complex array of emotional responses, ranging from elation to disappointment, and everything in between.

In the context of decision-making and goal setting, Alexander's quote prompts us to consider the interplay between our rational projections of the future and our emotional attachments to certain outcomes. It underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of human motivation and the complex interplay between cognitive processes and emotional states.

In conclusion, Samuel Alexander's quote encapsulates the intricate and multifaceted nature of human desires and expectations. It offers a thought-provoking exploration of the dynamic interplay between cognitive anticipations and emotional longings, highlighting the complex spectrum of human emotions and experiences. By delving into the philosophical and psychological dimensions of this quote, we gain a deeper understanding of the intricate interplay between our rational projections and our emotional attachments.