Meaning: The quote "Relativism is not indifference; on the contrary, passionate indifference is necessary in order for you not to hear the voices that oppose your absolute decrees" by Karel Capek, a Czech writer, playwright, and philosopher, encapsulates a thought-provoking perspective on relativism and the importance of maintaining an open-minded approach to differing viewpoints.

Relativism is a philosophical concept that suggests that there is no absolute truth or universal standard by which to judge or evaluate beliefs, values, and practices. Instead, it posits that truth and morality are relative to a particular framework, such as cultural, historical, or individual perspectives. In this context, Capek's quote challenges the notion that relativism equates to indifference, emphasizing that to truly embrace relativism, one must possess a passionate indifference – a deliberate detachment from absolute decrees and a willingness to engage with opposing voices.

The first part of the quote, "Relativism is not indifference," serves as a direct refutation of the misconception that embracing relativism entails a lack of concern or apathy towards differing beliefs and values. Instead, it suggests that relativism requires an active engagement with diverse perspectives, acknowledging the validity and contextuality of differing truths.

Capek's inclusion of "passionate indifference" in the quote is particularly thought-provoking. It implies that in order to navigate the complexities of relativism, one must maintain a sense of passionate detachment – a state of being deeply invested in understanding and respecting diverse viewpoints while simultaneously remaining unaffected by the pressures of absolute decrees. This concept challenges the idea that indifference is synonymous with passivity, suggesting instead that it can be a deliberate and passionate stance, allowing individuals to remain open to opposing voices without being swayed by rigid absolutes.

Furthermore, the quote highlights the necessity of passionate indifference as a means of resisting the temptation to impose absolute decrees on others. Absolute decrees are rigid, inflexible assertions of truth or morality that leave no room for alternative perspectives. By advocating for passionate indifference, Capek underscores the importance of humility and openness in the face of differing viewpoints, urging individuals to actively listen to and engage with opposing voices rather than imposing their own absolute truths onto others.

Capek's quote is particularly relevant in today's increasingly interconnected and diverse world, where encounters with differing beliefs and values are commonplace. In a globalized society, the ability to navigate relativism with passionate indifference can foster greater understanding, empathy, and cooperation among individuals and communities with diverse backgrounds and perspectives.

In conclusion, Karel Capek's quote encapsulates a profound reflection on the nature of relativism and the mindset required to engage with diverse viewpoints. It challenges the misconception that relativism equates to indifference and underscores the importance of maintaining a passionate indifference – a deliberate, open-minded stance that allows for the respectful consideration of opposing voices. By embracing passionate indifference, individuals can cultivate a deeper understanding of relativism and contribute to a more inclusive and empathetic society.