Meaning: Orson Scott Card, an acclaimed American author known for his science fiction and fantasy writing, once stated, "My favourite all-time work of fiction: Lord of the Rings. My favourite all-time nonfiction book: Guns, Germs, and Steel. Ask me again next week, you'll get a different answer." This quote speaks to the dynamic and ever-evolving nature of personal preferences when it comes to literature. It highlights the fact that an individual's favorite books can change over time and that there is a vast array of literary works that can resonate with different people at different stages of their lives.

"The Lord of the Rings" by J.R.R. Tolkien is a classic high fantasy novel that has captivated readers for decades. Set in the fictional world of Middle-earth, the story follows the quest to destroy a powerful ring and defeat the dark lord Sauron. With its richly detailed world-building, complex characters, and epic battle between good and evil, "The Lord of the Rings" has left a lasting impact on the fantasy genre and continues to enchant readers with its timeless themes of heroism, friendship, and the struggle against tyranny.

On the other hand, "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond is a nonfiction work that explores the factors that have shaped human societies and civilizations throughout history. Diamond investigates how geographical and environmental differences have influenced the development of various societies, examining the roles of agriculture, technology, and disease in shaping the course of human history. Through its interdisciplinary approach, "Guns, Germs, and Steel" offers a thought-provoking analysis of the forces that have shaped the modern world, challenging readers to reconsider their understanding of global history and societal development.

Orson Scott Card's statement reflects the idea that individuals' literary preferences are not fixed but can change over time based on their evolving interests, experiences, and perspectives. It also underscores the diversity of the literary landscape and the multitude of works that have the potential to resonate deeply with readers. This fluidity in personal preferences is a testament to the richness and depth of the literary world, where there is a wealth of genres, styles, and themes to explore.

Furthermore, the quote suggests that individuals' favorite books are not set in stone but can shift and evolve as they encounter new works and engage with different narratives. This fluidity in personal preferences is a testament to the richness and depth of the literary world, where there is a wealth of genres, styles, and themes to explore. It also speaks to the notion that each book holds the potential to leave a profound impact on readers, shaping their perspectives and influencing their literary tastes in unpredictable ways.

In conclusion, Orson Scott Card's quote encapsulates the dynamic nature of personal literary preferences and the vast array of works that have the power to resonate with individuals. It highlights the ever-changing relationship between readers and books, emphasizing that one's favorite works of fiction and nonfiction can vary over time and that the literary landscape is filled with diverse and compelling narratives waiting to be discovered and cherished.