Meaning: This quote from Orson Scott Card, a well-known science fiction and fantasy author, compares the quality of writing and acting in the movie "Twister" to that of the classic film "Citizen Kane." Card's statement is provocative and thought-provoking, as it challenges the traditional notion that "Citizen Kane" is the epitome of great filmmaking.

When analyzing Card's quote, it is important to consider the context in which it was made. Orson Scott Card is known for his outspoken opinions and strong viewpoints on various subjects, including literature and film. He is also a respected writer with a deep understanding of storytelling and the craft of writing. Therefore, his statement should be taken seriously and warrants a closer examination.

First, let's look at "Citizen Kane," a 1941 film directed by and starring Orson Welles. "Citizen Kane" is widely regarded as one of the greatest films ever made and is often praised for its innovative storytelling, visual style, and complex characters. The film's screenplay, co-written by Orson Welles and Herman J. Mankiewicz, is known for its depth and sophistication, and the acting performances are considered exemplary.

On the other hand, "Twister," released in 1996 and directed by Jan de Bont, is a disaster film that follows a group of storm chasers as they pursue tornadoes across Oklahoma. While "Twister" is not typically held in the same regard as "Citizen Kane" in terms of critical acclaim or artistic achievement, Card's quote suggests that he believes "Twister" contains more good writing and good acting in any ten minutes than "Citizen Kane" does in its entirety.

It is essential to recognize that Card's statement is subjective and based on his personal assessment of the two films. While many film critics and scholars may disagree with Card's assertion, it is crucial to consider the criteria by which he is evaluating the quality of writing and acting in both movies. Card may be highlighting the entertainment value, emotional resonance, or storytelling techniques present in "Twister" that he feels surpass the corresponding elements in "Citizen Kane."

In assessing Card's quote, it is also important to acknowledge the different genres, styles, and intentions of the two films. "Citizen Kane" is a groundbreaking work of art that revolutionized filmmaking and storytelling, while "Twister" is a commercial blockbuster driven by action and spectacle. The criteria for evaluating the writing and acting in these films may vary significantly, and Card's perspective may stem from a preference for the visceral excitement and immediacy of "Twister" over the more introspective and layered approach of "Citizen Kane."

Furthermore, Card's statement raises the broader question of how we define and measure "good writing" and "good acting" in the context of film. While "Citizen Kane" is often celebrated for its literary and dramatic qualities, "Twister" may excel in different aspects such as dialogue, character dynamics, or kinetic performances. Card's assertion challenges us to reconsider the criteria by which we assess the artistic merits of films and to recognize that excellence can manifest in diverse forms and genres.

In conclusion, Orson Scott Card's quote comparing "Twister" and "Citizen Kane" offers a thought-provoking perspective on the subjective nature of evaluating writing and acting in film. While it may be contentious to equate the two movies in terms of artistic achievement, Card's statement encourages a reevaluation of our criteria for assessing the quality of storytelling and performance in cinema. Whether or not one agrees with Card's assessment, his quote serves as a catalyst for deeper reflection on the multifaceted nature of cinematic excellence.