Meaning: This quote by John Carmack, a renowned scientist and video game developer, touches on the subjective nature of entertainment, particularly in the context of video games. Carmack's words suggest that entertainment, including video games, is inherently subjective and cannot cater to everyone's preferences or expectations. He also implies that in some cases, the enjoyment of entertainment, such as video games, can lead to divisive and tribalistic behavior among its audience. The quote offers valuable insights into the complexities of creating and consuming entertainment, especially in the ever-evolving landscape of video game culture.

In the first part of the quote, Carmack acknowledges the subjective nature of entertainment, emphasizing that what may be enjoyable or entertaining for one person may not necessarily be so for another. This idea is fundamental to understanding the wide range of tastes and preferences among consumers of entertainment, including video games. Different individuals have diverse backgrounds, experiences, and interests, which influence their perception of what constitutes enjoyable entertainment. Thus, a particular video game, movie, or any form of entertainment may resonate deeply with some while failing to captivate others.

Carmack's assertion that entertainment "can't win for everyone" reflects the inherent challenge faced by creators in attempting to please a diverse and discerning audience. In the context of video games, developers often strive to create experiences that will appeal to a broad spectrum of players. However, Carmack's observation underscores the futility of trying to create a universally beloved piece of entertainment. Instead, creators must accept the inherent subjectivity of their work and embrace the reality that not everyone will find it appealing.

The latter part of the quote delves into the darker side of entertainment, where Carmack suggests that certain forms of entertainment, such as video games, can become symbols for divisive and tribal behavior. This observation resonates strongly within the context of gaming culture, where passionate fan bases often develop around specific games or gaming platforms. In some cases, this passion can lead to toxic behavior, including online harassment, gatekeeping, and antagonistic rivalries between fan communities.

Carmack's reference to "petty tribal behavior" highlights the potential for entertainment, particularly video games, to become a catalyst for negative and exclusionary conduct. This phenomenon is often observed in online gaming communities, where fervent loyalty to a particular game or gaming platform can lead to the vilification of those with differing preferences. The tribalistic tendencies within gaming culture can create an environment where individuals are ostracized or attacked based on their entertainment choices, undermining the potential for constructive and inclusive discourse.

In conclusion, John Carmack's quote provides a thought-provoking perspective on the subjective nature of entertainment, particularly within the realm of video games. His insights underscore the challenges faced by creators in crafting entertainment that resonates with diverse audiences while also highlighting the potential for divisive and tribal behavior to emerge within fan communities. Understanding and acknowledging the subjective nature of entertainment is crucial for both creators and consumers, as it fosters empathy, open-mindedness, and a more inclusive approach to engaging with diverse forms of entertainment.