Meaning: The quote "Robert Moses wasn't elected to anything. We're taught that in a democracy power comes from being elected. He had more power than anyone, and he held it for 48 years" by Robert Caro sheds light on the influence and authority held by Robert Moses, a prominent figure in urban planning and development in New York City. This quote encapsulates the unconventional nature of power dynamics and governance, particularly in the context of urban planning and infrastructure development.

Robert Moses, often referred to as the "master builder" of mid-20th century New York City, was never elected to any public office, yet he wielded immense power and influence over the city's infrastructure and development for nearly five decades. His career spanned from the 1920s to the 1960s, during which he held multiple appointed positions, primarily as the head of various public authorities and agencies responsible for shaping the city's landscape.

Moses' power and influence stemmed from his ability to navigate and exploit the complex web of public authorities and bureaucracies that controlled the allocation of resources and decision-making processes related to urban development. Through his tenure, he orchestrated the construction of numerous highways, bridges, parks, and public housing projects, fundamentally reshaping the physical and social fabric of New York City.

The notion that power in a democracy comes from being elected is challenged by Moses' legacy, as he demonstrated that unelected officials could exert significant control and leave a lasting impact on the built environment and the lives of urban residents. His ability to amass and consolidate power without being directly accountable to the electorate raises important questions about the dynamics of governance, accountability, and democratic principles within the context of urban planning and development.

Moses' approach to urban planning and development was characterized by top-down decision-making, often criticized for its disregard of community input and its detrimental effects on marginalized neighborhoods. His projects, such as the construction of expressways and the clearance of low-income communities for urban renewal, have been scrutinized for their social and environmental consequences, leading to a reevaluation of his legacy and the long-term impacts of his interventions.

Despite never holding elected office, Moses' influence extended far beyond the confines of traditional political power. His ability to shape the physical and social landscape of New York City underscores the intricate interplay between bureaucracy, finance, and decision-making processes in urban governance. His legacy serves as a cautionary tale about the concentration of power in the hands of unelected officials and the potential ramifications for democratic principles and community well-being.

In conclusion, Robert Caro's quote encapsulates the paradox of power and democracy in the context of Robert Moses' influential career. Moses' ability to wield immense power without being elected challenges conventional notions of democratic governance and highlights the complexities of urban planning and development. His legacy continues to provoke discussions about the nature of power, accountability, and community engagement in shaping the urban environment.