Meaning: This quote by Fred Allen, the American comedian, provides an interesting commentary on the shift in conversational dynamics and attitudes over time. The reference to "Samuel Johnson days" harks back to the 18th century, a period known for its intellectual salons and gatherings where erudite discussions and debates were common. Samuel Johnson himself was a prominent figure of the time, known for his wit and conversational prowess. The phrase "big men enjoying small talk" suggests that even esteemed individuals of the era engaged in casual, lighthearted conversations, highlighting the idea that intellectual giants of the past were comfortable with the simplicity of small talk.

In contrast, Allen's observation about the present day, encapsulated in the statement "today we have small men enjoying big talk," implies a reversal of this dynamic. The term "big talk" could be interpreted as grandiose or inflated discourse that lacks substance, often characterized by self-aggrandizement or empty rhetoric. Meanwhile, the use of "small men" in this context does not necessarily refer to physical stature, but rather suggests a contrast in intellectual or moral character compared to the "big men" of Johnson's era. It seems to hint at a situation where individuals who may not possess substantial knowledge or achievements are indulging in verbose and ostentatious speech.

This quote raises thought-provoking questions about the nature of conversation, the values attached to different types of discourse, and the shifting cultural attitudes towards communication. To understand the implications of Allen's words, it is essential to delve into the historical context from which this sentiment arises.

The "Samuel Johnson days" were marked by a flourishing of intellectual exchange, with coffeehouses, salons, and debating societies serving as hubs for the exchange of ideas. This era valued wit, eloquence, and the ability to engage in meaningful discourse. Samuel Johnson himself was renowned for his conversational skills, as evidenced by his famous aphorisms and contributions to the English language through his dictionary and essays. In this context, "small talk" may have been viewed as an opportunity for social bonding and the exploration of everyday experiences, rather than being dismissed as trivial or inconsequential.

In contemporary society, there is a complex interplay of factors that have influenced conversational norms. The advent of social media, the proliferation of 24-hour news cycles, and the rise of celebrity culture have all contributed to a landscape where bombastic oratory and superficial engagement often garner attention. This shift has led to a reevaluation of what constitutes meaningful discourse and has raised concerns about the quality of public dialogue.

It's important to note that Allen's quote is not a wholesale condemnation of modern conversation, but rather a commentary on the perceived imbalance between substance and style in contemporary communication. The juxtaposition of "big talk" and "small talk" serves as a lens through which to examine the nature of discourse in different eras and the values attached to it.

In conclusion, Fred Allen's quote offers a compelling reflection on the evolution of conversation and the cultural shifts that have shaped our attitudes towards communication. By contrasting the eras of Samuel Johnson with the present day, Allen prompts us to consider the virtues of engaging in meaningful dialogue versus indulging in empty rhetoric. This quote serves as a catalyst for introspection, inviting us to critically assess the nature of our own conversations and the impact of societal changes on our communication habits.