I mean the public likes it more in Europe than they do here because the state supported organizations have felt that playing contemporary music was part of the education of the public.

Profession: Composer

Topics: Education, Music, Europe, Public, State,

Wallpaper of quote
Views: 20
Meaning: The quote by Elliott Carter touches on the perception and reception of contemporary music in Europe compared to the United States. It reflects Carter's observation that the public in Europe tends to appreciate contemporary music more than in the United States due to the support and emphasis placed on such music by state-funded organizations. Carter, a prominent American composer, offers insight into the cultural and institutional differences that shape the reception of contemporary music on both sides of the Atlantic.

In exploring Carter's quote, it is essential to consider the historical and cultural contexts that have influenced the appreciation of contemporary music in Europe and the United States. In Europe, particularly in countries with strong traditions of state-supported arts and culture, contemporary music has often been integrated into the educational and cultural programs that receive public funding. This support has allowed for the regular performance and promotion of contemporary compositions, thereby familiarizing audiences with new musical styles and forms.

Conversely, the United States has historically had a more complex relationship with contemporary classical music. The country's emphasis on commercialism and popular culture has sometimes led to a marginalization of contemporary classical music in the broader cultural landscape. Additionally, the decentralized nature of arts funding in the United States means that the support for contemporary music can vary significantly from one region to another, impacting the exposure and education of the public regarding this genre.

Carter's assertion that state-supported organizations in Europe view playing contemporary music as part of the public's education highlights the role of institutional and governmental support in shaping public attitudes towards contemporary music. In Europe, state-funded orchestras, opera houses, and educational institutions often prioritize the inclusion of contemporary works in their programming, thus exposing audiences to a diverse range of musical expressions. This approach contributes to cultivating an environment where contemporary music is not only tolerated but embraced as an essential component of cultural education and enrichment.

On the other hand, the United States' more market-driven approach to cultural production and consumption has at times resulted in a greater reliance on established canonical works and a reluctance to take risks with more avant-garde or challenging contemporary compositions. This has created a perception that contemporary music may be less accessible or appealing to the broader public, potentially leading to lower levels of public engagement and appreciation.

However, it is important to note that the landscape of contemporary music appreciation in the United States is evolving. While state support may not be as prevalent as in Europe, American composers, performers, and arts organizations have been actively working to promote and integrate contemporary music into the cultural fabric of the country. Initiatives such as composer residencies, new music ensembles, and collaborations between educational institutions and professional organizations have sought to bridge the gap and foster a deeper understanding and appreciation of contemporary music among the public.

In conclusion, Elliott Carter's quote sheds light on the contrasting attitudes towards contemporary music in Europe and the United States, emphasizing the impact of institutional support and cultural policies on public reception. While Europe's state-supported organizations have historically prioritized the inclusion of contemporary music as part of public education, the United States' more market-oriented cultural landscape has presented challenges in promoting and integrating contemporary classical music. Nonetheless, efforts to advocate for and expose audiences to contemporary music in the United States are underway, reflecting a shifting cultural landscape and a growing recognition of the value of embracing diverse musical expressions.

0.0 / 5

0 Reviews

5
(0)

4
(0)

3
(0)

2
(0)

1
(0)