Meaning: This quote by Iris Chang, a renowned historian and author, encapsulates the challenges and complexities inherent in the process of distilling vast and multifaceted subjects into a coherent narrative. When she mentions "something extremely broad," Chang is likely referring to the extensive breadth of historical events, cultural phenomena, or social dynamics that historians often grapple with when attempting to encapsulate an era, a movement, or a civilization within the confines of a book, article, or lecture.

Chang suggests that the task of presenting such expansive subjects is not merely about expanding or compressing the material to fit a particular format; rather, it involves the formidable challenge of deciding what to include and what to omit. In essence, it's a process of discernment and selection, where the historian must make critical choices about which details, events, and perspectives to prioritize, and which to leave out. This aspect of historical scholarship speaks to the inherent subjectivity and interpretive nature of the discipline, as well as the ethical responsibilities that historians bear in shaping narratives about the past.

Iris Chang's own work exemplifies the weighty decisions involved in historical writing. Her groundbreaking book, "The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II," delved into the harrowing atrocities committed by Japanese forces in Nanking, China, in 1937-1938. In tackling this deeply traumatic and expansive subject, Chang faced the daunting task of distilling a vast array of historical accounts, testimonies, and archival materials into a compelling and impactful narrative. Her meticulous research and dedication to portraying the human suffering and resilience during this dark chapter of history underscore the profound moral and intellectual challenges inherent in her quote.

Moreover, Chang's quote resonates not only within the realm of historical scholarship but also in various other fields, such as literature, art, and even technological innovation. For instance, authors and artists often confront the dilemma of what to include and what to leave out in their creative works. This process is not merely about fitting a story or an image into a prescribed format; it's about honing the narrative or visual composition to convey a specific message or evoke particular emotions.

In the realm of technology and design, the concept of "less is more" reflects a similar sentiment. When engineers and designers develop products or interfaces, they face the challenge of streamlining complex features and functionalities to create a user-friendly and efficient experience. This often involves the difficult task of deciding what to prioritize and what to discard, a process that demands a deep understanding of user needs and preferences.

Chang's quote also prompts reflection on the broader implications of selective storytelling and narrative construction. In the context of history, the choices made by historians in shaping narratives can have far-reaching consequences, influencing public understanding, collective memory, and even policy decisions. The inclusion or exclusion of certain voices and perspectives in historical accounts can profoundly impact how events are interpreted and remembered.

Additionally, Chang's quote underscores the vital importance of critical thinking and ethical judgment in the construction of narratives. Historians, writers, and creators must grapple with questions of representation, bias, and omission as they navigate the complexities of their subjects. By acknowledging the inherent difficulties of deciding what to include and what to discard, Chang's quote serves as a reminder of the responsibility that accompanies the act of storytelling and knowledge production.

In conclusion, Iris Chang's quote encapsulates the profound challenges and ethical considerations involved in distilling expansive subjects into coherent narratives. Whether in the domain of historical scholarship, creative arts, or technological innovation, the process of selective storytelling and decision-making carries significant implications for how we understand the past, engage with cultural expressions, and interact with the world around us. Chang's own contributions to historical writing serve as a testament to the rigorous intellectual and moral demands inherent in this endeavor.