Meaning: The quote by Chuck Close touches on the subject of artistic tools and techniques, and the differing perspectives of artists and art historians regarding their use. It suggests that artists are not perturbed by the revelation that other artists may have used aids such as lenses or mirrors in creating their works, whereas art historians may find this revelation unsettling. This quote raises thought-provoking questions about the nature of artistic creation, the role of technology and tools in art, and the interpretation of art through different lenses.

The use of aids or tools in creating art has been a topic of debate throughout history. Many renowned artists, including the likes of Vermeer and Caravaggio, have been speculated to have used devices such as the camera obscura to aid in the creation of their works. This practice has been a source of fascination and controversy, as it challenges the romanticized notion of the solitary artist creating masterpieces solely through their own skill and vision.

From the perspective of artists, the use of aids or tools in the creative process may be seen as a means to an end. For some, these tools serve as a way to achieve technical precision or to capture the world with greater accuracy. Artists may view the use of such aids as a practical approach to achieving their artistic vision, rather than as a compromise to their authenticity or talent. Furthermore, the acceptance of these tools as part of the artistic process can open up new possibilities for creative expression and experimentation.

On the other hand, art historians may approach the revelation of artists using aids with a different set of concerns. The traditional narrative of art history often emphasizes the individual genius and originality of the artist. The idea that artists may have relied on external aids can challenge this romanticized view, raising questions about the authenticity and authorship of artworks. This can be particularly unsettling for art historians who seek to unravel the mysteries of artistic creation and attribute works to specific artists based on their unique style or technique.

In a broader context, the quote by Chuck Close also highlights the evolving relationship between art and technology. Throughout history, artists have adapted and incorporated new tools and technologies into their practice, from the invention of perspective in the Renaissance to the use of digital tools in contemporary art. Each technological advancement has influenced the way art is created and perceived, challenging traditional notions of artistic skill and authenticity.

The quote also prompts reflection on the subjective nature of art interpretation. The reactions to the use of aids in art reveal differing attitudes towards the creative process and the value attributed to the artist's intentions versus the final outcome of the artwork. It underscores the complexity of artistic creation and the layers of meaning that can be uncovered through the intersection of artistic practice, historical context, and critical interpretation.

Ultimately, Chuck Close's quote invites us to consider the multifaceted nature of art and the diverse perspectives that shape our understanding of it. It sparks a dialogue about the role of tools and technology in artistic creation, the intersection of art and art history, and the ongoing evolution of the artistic landscape. By acknowledging the varied responses to the use of aids in art, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the complexities and nuances that enrich the world of art and creativity.